Comparison of the Physicochemical Analysis of Commercial Sumac Fruits and Naturally Grown Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) Fruits in the Artvin Region

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13i8.2040-2047.7620

Keywords:

Rhus coriaria L., sumac, physicochemical analysis, bioactive compounds, Antioxidant

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the physicochemical and bioactive properties of natural sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) fruits from the Artvin region with those of commercially available sumac. Both sample types were analyzed for moisture, fat, protein, carbohydrate content, pH, titratable acidity, total phenolic and flavonoid contents, and trace element concentrations. The findings revealed that natural sumac had a higher fat content (28%) and a lower pH (2.92) than commercial samples. Moreover, it exhibited significantly higher total phenolic (47.95 mg GAE/g) and tannin (23.46 mg catechin/g) contents, while flavonoid levels showed no significant difference. Trace element analysis indicated that commercial sumac had higher concentrations of zinc (10.87 mg/kg) and copper (1.78 mg/kg), whereas natural sumac was richer in iron (255.65 mg/kg), magnesium (788.4 mg/kg), and manganese (17.41 mg/kg). These results underscore the superior nutritional and antioxidant potential of natural sumac, highlighting its possible applications in the food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries.

References

Abu-Reidah, I. M., Jamous, R. M., Ali-Shtayeh, M. S. (2014). Phytochemistry,pharmacological properties and industrial applications of Rhus coriaria L.(sumac). Jordan journal of biological sciences, 7(4).

Ali, H. M., Karataş, F., Özer, D., & Saydam, S. (2024). Element and Water-Soluble Vitamins Profile of Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac) Grown in Different Regions. Biological Trace Element Research, 202(7), 3293-3302.

Adwan, G., Abu-Shanab, B., Abu-Safiya, D. I., Abu-Shanab, M. (2015). Antibacterial activity of Rhus coriaria. L extracts growing in Palestine. IUG Journal of Natural Studies, 13(2).

Alsamri, H., Athamneh, K., Pintus, G., Eid, A. H., Iratni, R. (2021). Pharmacological and antioxidant activities of Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac). Antioxidants, 10(1), 73.

Ardalani, H., Hassanpoor, M. M., Hadipanah, A., Fotovat, F., Azizi, A., Soltani, J. (2016). Identification and characterization of chemical composition of Rhus coriaria L. fruit from Hamadan, Western Iran.

Basoglu, F., & Cemeroglu, B. (1984). Sumak’ın Kimyasal Bilesimi Üzerine Arastırma. Gıda, 9, 167.

Batiha, G. E. S., Ogunyemi, O. M., Shaheen, H. M., Kutu, F. R., Olaiya, C. O., Sabatier, J. M., De Waard, M. (2022). Rhus coriaria L. (Sumac), a versatile and resourceful food spice with cornucopia of polyphenols. Molecules, 27(16), 5179.

Bizim Bitkiler Şubat. 2025. URL: https://bizimbitkiler.org.tr/list.html

Candan, F. (2003). Effect of Rhus coriaria L. (Anacardiaceae) on superoxide radical scavenging and xanthine oxidase activity. Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry, 18(1), 59-62.

Chen, G., Chen, H. (2011). Extraction and deglycosylation of flavonoids from sumac fruits using steam explosion. Food chemistry, 126(4), 1934-1938.

Davis, P.H., Coode, J.E & Cullen, J. 1967. Rhus L. – In: Davis, P.H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh Univ. Press, Vol: 2, pp. 543-544. Edinburgh.El Hasasna, H., Athamneh, K., Al Samri, H., Karuvantevida, N., Al Dhaheri, Y., Hisaindee, S., Iratni, R. (2015). Rhus coriaria induces senescence and autophagic cell death in breast cancer cells through a mechanism involving p38 and ERK1/2 activation. Scientific reports, 5(1), 13013.

Khalilpour, S., Behnammanesh, G., Suede, F., Ezzat, M. O., Muniandy, J., Tabana, Y., Majid, A. S. (2018). Neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of Rhus coriaria extract in a mouse model of ischemic opticneuropathy. Biomedicines, 6(2), 48.

Kizil, S.; Turk, M. (2010). Microelement Contents and Fatty Acid Compositions of Rhus coriaria L. and Pistacia Terebinthus, L. Fruits Spread Commonly in the South Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey. Nat. Prod. Res, 24, 92–98.

Konanç, M. U. (2023). Monitoring trace element concentrations with environmentally friendly biomonitors in Artvin, Turkey. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(8), 1001.

Kosar, M., Bozan, B., Temelli, F.,Baser, K. H. C. (2007). Antioxidant activity and phenolic composition of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) extracts. Food chemistry, 103(3), 952-959.

Kossah, R., Nsabimana, C., Zhao, J., Chen, H., Tian, F., Zhang, H., Chen, W. (2009). Comparative study on the chemical composition of Syrian sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) and Chinese sumac (Rhus typhina L.) fruits. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 8(10), 1570-1574.

Matthaus, B., Özcan, M. M. (2015). Fatty acid composition, tocopherol, and sterol contents of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology, 117(8), 1301-1302.

Mohammadi, S., Kouhsari, S. M., Feshani, A. M. (2010). Antidiabetic properties of the ethanolic extract of Rhus coriaria fruits in rats. Daru: journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 18(4), 270.

Morshedloo, M. R., Fereydouni, S., Ahmadi, H., Hassanpouraghdam, M. B., Aghaee, A., Mehrabani, L. V., Maggi, F. (2022). Natural diversity in fatty acids profiles and antioxidant properties of sumac fruits (Rhus coriaria L.): Selection of preferable populations for food industries. Food Chemistry, 374, 131757.

Nielsen, S. S., Carpenter, C. E., & Ward, R. E. (2017). Glucose Determination by Enzyme Analysis. Food Analysis Laboratory Manual, 203-206.

Ozcan, A., Susluoglu, Z., Nogay, G., Ergun, M., Sutyemez, M. (2021). Phytochemical characterization of some sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) genotypes from southern part of turkey. Food Chemistry, 358, 129779.

Ozcan, M., Hacisefer-ogullari, H. A. (2004). Some Phsico-Chemical Properties. Bulg J Plant Physiol, 30(3-4), 74-84.

Razavi, M. A., Akbari, R. (2009). Biophysical properties of agricultural products and foodstuffs. Jahad Daneshgahi of Mashad Univ. Press. 304p.

Sabzghabaee, A. M., Kelishadi, R., Golshiri, K., Ghannadi, A.,Badri, S. (2014). Clinical effects of Rhus coriaria fruits on dyslipidemia in adolescents: a triple-blinded randomized placebo-controlled trial. Medical archives, 68(5), 308.

Sakhr, K., El Khatib, S. (2019). The use of Syrian Sumac (Rhus coriaria) as a meat tenderizer: effect on fat, protein and collagen profiles on pectoralis superficialis cut. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology, 7(8), 1203-1215.

Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R., Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. (1999). Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent. In Methods in enzymology (Vol. 299, pp. 152-178). Academic press.

Soria-Melgarejo, G., Raya-Pérez, J. C., Ramírez-Pimentel, J. G., Covarrubias-Prieto, J., Gutiérrez-Benicio, G. M., Andrade-González, I., Aguirre-Mancilla, C. L. (2024). Physicochemical, nutritional properties, and antioxidant potential of ‘limilla’fruit (Rhus aromatica var. schmidelioides (Schltdl.) Heliyon, 10(15).

Sumak Fizibilite Raporu ve Yatırımcı Rehberi URL: https://kutuphane.tarimorman.gov.tr/pdf_goster?file=7e7d041bfffcd08ffc8196bf07a71cf7&search=sumak+fizibilite+raporu#book/11

Terzioğlu, S., & Coşkunçelebi, K. (2017). Rhus chinensis var. chinensis (Anacardiaceae): a new alien record for the flora of Turkey. Phytologia Balcanica, 23(2), 167-170.

Torun, L. (2019). Sumak bitkisinin fenolik madde içeriği ve antioksidan aktivite özellikleri (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Gıda Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.

Yazdanpour, F., Khadivi, A., & Etemadi-Khah, A. (2018). Phenotypic characterization of black raspberry to select the promising genotypes. Scientia Horticulturae, 235, 95-105.

Yegin, S. Ç. (2017). Farklı yörelere ait sumak (Rhus Coriaria L.) Ekşisinin antioksidan kapasitesinin belirlenmesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2(2), 35-39.

Downloads

Published

28.08.2025

Issue

Section

Research Paper