An Investigation on Farmers’ Comprehension of Irrigation Applications and Assessment of Agricultural Cooperatives’ Services, Khartoum State- SUDAN

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13is2.3444-3452.7953

Keywords:

Sudan, Khartoum state, Irrigation Management,, Irrigation Management, Cooperative, Water Management, Irrigation Planning

Abstract

This study is based on a field survey of farmers in Khartoum State, Sudan. The aim of the study is to assess members of cooperatives’ knowledge and proficiency with irrigation water application and other agricultural technical packages. The study was carried out in the years 2018–2020. In light of the study’s findings; The vast majority of farmers (81.1%) surveyed do not know the structure of their soil. 9.1% of farmers stated that they used fertilizer based on soil analysis results, 64.8% of farmers said they use fertilizer based on guesswork, and 25% of farmers use fertilizer by asking their friends. 45.5% of farmers stated they don’t know the quality of irrigation water, and 15.9% said it’s unimportant to know irrigation water quality. A 18.2% of farmers preferred that the irrigation costs be calculated based on irrigation duration, and 51.1% of farmer said irrigation costs must be determined based on agricultural area. According to 93.2% of the farmers the electricity or diesel fee is expensive. Only 4.5% of farmers said they determined irrigation time by controlling the soil. According to the survey, 78.4% of farmers determined the amount of water to be applied to the field by guesswork. The surface irrigation method (flood irrigation) was used by 97.7% of the farmers surveyed. 18.2% of farmers prefer pressured (modern) irrigation as the most suitable irrigation method, and 68.2% prefer surface (flood) irrigation. Only 6.8% of the farmers surveyed used the drip irrigation system, and 40.9% did not use the system because they found it expensive. According to the survey, 87.5% of farmers were dissatisfied with the irrigation plan, 67% thought the irrigation time is controllable, 60.2% thought the irrigation interval is manageable. 40.9% of the farmers thought the irrigation cost is reasonable, and 45.5% thought the irrigation cost is good-very good. 68.2% of farmers stated bad-very bad evaluations to irrigation networks maintenance and repair operations. Therefore, it is important to increase farmer knowledge, offer technical packages through demonstration fields, and encourage and support the use of modern irrigation techniques.

Author Biographies

Nizamettin Çiftçi, Selcuk University, Agriculture College, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, 42130, Konya, Türkiye

Prof. Dr. Nizamettin Cifici

Selcuk University, Agriculture College, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Konya, Turkey

Mehmet Şahin , Selcuk University, Agriculture College, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, 42130, Konya, Türkiye

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mehmet Şahin

Selcuk University, Agriculture College, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Konya, Turkey

References

Adam, A. B., Elamin, A. W. M., & Hamid, A. (2017). Effect of management practices on water use efficiency of Gezira irrigated scheme–Sudan. International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and soil. Science, 40-45. https://doi.org/2017.058

Anonymous. (2019). Khartoum State. wikipedia. Retrieved 01.04.2019 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khartoum_State

Aysu, A. (2021). Kooperatifler (Vol. 214). Yeni İnsan Yayınevi.

Elfaki, J., Gafer, M., Sulieman, M., & Ali, M. (2015). Comparison and evaluation of two analytical Methods for cation exchange capacity and exchangeable sodium percentage of five soil types in Central Sudan. Open Journal of Soil Science, 5(12), 311-318. https://doi.org/ 10.4236/ojss.2015.512029

Falkenmark, M. (1989). The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa: why isn’t it being addressed? Ambio, 112-118.

Falkenmark, M., & Widstrand, C. (1992). Population and water resources: a delicate balance. Population bulletin, 47(3), 1-36.

FAO. (2012). Coping with water scarcity An action framework for agriculture and food security. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 19.07.2018 from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.fao.org/4/i3015e/i3015e.pdf

Kenneth, T., & Neeltje, K. (2002). Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). https://www.fao.org/4/ap103e/ap103e.pdf

Meire, P., Coenen, M., Lombardo, C., Robba, M., & Sacile, R. (2007). Integrated water management: practical experiences and case studies (Vol. 80). Springer Science & Business Media.

Mohamed, Y. F.-A. A., & Çiftçi, N. (2018). Sudan’s water resources management. 4. International academic research congress INES IV, Alanya/ Antalya, Türkiye.

Mohammed, Y. F. A., &

Cifici, N. (2019). Irrigation effectiveness of agricultural cooperatives in Sudan Khartoum State International Congress of Science Culture And Education (INCES), Alanya/Antalya- Türkiye.

UN. (2019). World Population Prospects 2019. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved 22.10.2020 from chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://population.un.org/wpp/assets/Files/WPP2019_DataBooklet.pdf

Wanjeru, N. E. (2018). Factors influencing performance of irrigation cooperatives in Embu County, Kenya University of Nairobi].

WMO. (2020). Weather forecast of Khartoum (capital city). Sudan Meteorological Authority. Retrieved 22.09.2019 from https://worldweather.wmo.int/en/city.html?cityId=249

Zhang, C.-H., & Benjamin, W. A. (2021). The contribution of cooperative irrigation scheme to poverty reduction in Tanzania. Journal of integrative agriculture, 20(4), 953-963.

Downloads

Published

23.11.2025