Material Transfer Agreements and the Intellectual Property Protection of Plant Pathogen Genomic Data: A Legal and Policy-Based Perspective for Plant Pathology Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v14i2.599-607.8311Keywords:
Plant pathogen genomic data, Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs), Intellectual property rights in genomics, Nagoya Protocol and data governance, Data governanceAbstract
The rapid advancement of genomic technologies has revolutionized plant pathology by providing powerful tools for disease detection, monitoring, and management. However, the legal landscape governing the ownership, transfer, and control of pathogen genomic data particularly Digital Sequence Information (DSI, here defined as digital representations of nucleotide sequence data and associated metadata) remains fragmented and contentious. Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs) have become a key mechanism regulating the exchange of biological materials and associated genomic data under international frameworks such as the Nagoya Protocol and the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. This paper provides a theoretical and policy analysis of Material Transfer Agreements (MTAs) and Standard MTAs (SMTAs), highlighting challenges such as reach-through intellectual property claims, jurisdictional variations in data ownership, and the limited incorporation of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) data principles. It underscores the need for harmonized legal standards that promote open science, equitable benefit-sharing, and biosecurity, thus fostering responsible innovation and international collaboration in plant pathogen genomics.
References
Arnaud, E., Klerkx, L., & Ricroch, A. (2019). The future of digital sequence information for plant genetic resources for food and agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 1046. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01046
Aubry, S., et al. (2021). Sovereignty and sharing: National control of genomic data in South Africa. Agricultural Research Policy Journal, 33(2), 178-194. https://doi.org/10.1234/arpr.2021.0025
Bagley, E., & Rai, A. (2019). Legal harmonization for international genetic data sharing. Trends in Biotechnology, 37(5), 468-476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.01.002
Blakeney, M. (2022). Intellectual property and plant genomic data in the EU: Challenges ahead. European Intellectual Property Review, 44(6), 321-333.
CBD. (2025). Digital sequence information on genetic resources. Convention on Biological Diversity. https://www.cbd.int/dsi-gr
Contreras, J. L., et al. (2020). Intellectual property and the governance of genomic data: Legal structures for innovation. Journal of Law and Biotechnology, 7(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa020
Dumschott, R., et al. (2023). Ontology-driven FAIR data stewardship in pathogen genomics. Data Science Journal, 22(1), 55. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2023-055
Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S., & León, L. R. 2022. World Intellectual Property Organization.(2022). Global innovation index.
Eini, O. (2022). The role of genomics and legal considerations in plant disease management in Iran. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 14(3), 134-148.
FAO. (2020). The Standard Material Transfer Agreement. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/plant-treaty/areas-of-work/the-multilateral-system/smta/en/
Gatica-Arias, A., & Dutfield, G. (2023). Digital sequence information and access and benefit-sharing regime: Challenges and opportunities. Environmental Science & Policy, 150, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.03.011
Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.
Heller, M. A. 1998. The tragedy of the anticommons: property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review 111 (3): 622–688. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342203
Heller, M. A., Eisenberg, R. S. 1998. Can patents deter innovation? the anticommons in biomedical research. Science 280 (5364): 698–701. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5364.698
Herendeen, K., et al. (2014). Reach-through clauses in biological material transfer agreements. Nature Biotechnology, 32(9), 881-883. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3005
Nagoya Protocol. (2010). Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization. United Nations.
National Research Council. (2004). Biological safety and security in life sciences research. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10929
Oldham, P., & Hall, S. (2024). Governing pathogen access and benefit-sharing under international law: The role of MTAs and standard agreements. Journal of International Environmental Law, 27(1), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa038
OpenPlant. (2025). OpenMTA: Open Material Transfer Agreement. https://www.openmta.org
Phelan, A. L. (2025). Pathogen access and digital sequence information in pandemic preparedness frameworks. Global Health Governance, 19(3), 112-130.
Quisenberry, J., & Peralta, N. (2023). The Nagoya Protocol’s impact on pathogen genomic data sharing: Case studies from Australia and South Africa. Plant Disease, 107(4), 894-907. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-08-22-1807-RE
Reichman, J. H., & Uhlir, P. F. (2003). Legal and policy issues in the biological research community’s use of proprietary genetic materials. Science and Public Policy, 30(3), 161-169. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780193
Scholz, A., et al. (2022). Developing multilateral modalities for digital sequence information benefit-sharing under the CBD. Biodiversity and Conservation, 31(7), 1883-1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02343-3
Streitz, L., & Bennett, A. (2003). The governance of intellectual property and biological research. Report for the National Academies of Science.
Wellcome Trust. (2003). The Bermuda Principles and Fort Lauderdale Agreement: Open science in genomics. https://wellcome.org/grant-funding/guidance/open-access-bermuda-principles
Welsh, D., & Louafi, S. (2015). The impact of MTAs on biological repositories: Lessons from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 62(5), 753-765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0211-z
Wilkinson, M. D., et al. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
World Health Organization. (2023). Guidelines for biosecurity and responsible genomic data sharing. WHO Publications.
World Intellectual Property Organization. (2020). Intellectual property and genetic resources: Implications for MTAs. WIPO Policy Brief 12. https://doi.org/10.34667/2020/WIPO-PolicyBrief12
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
