Determination of the Change of Agricultural Landscapes Based on CORINE Land Cover Agricultural Land Classes Using GIS and Visual Quality Value with the AHP Method: The Case of Tekı̇rdağ Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i8.1366-1377.6986Keywords:
CORINE Land Cover, Agricultural landscape, Visual quality, AHP, TekirdağAbstract
Agricultural landscapes contribute positively to the visual texture of the city and change over time. In this context, this study aims to determine the visual landscape quality of agricultural landscapes based on parameters on expert approach the hypothesis; it is important and necessary to determine the visual landscape values based on the change in agricultural landscapes over time. Within the framework of the developed hypothesis, it aims to make an expert-based visual landscape assessment of the agricultural landscapes of Tekirdağ Province, located in the northwestern part of Türkiye, based on nine subclasses created according to the CORINE land cover (CLC) classes, on the basis of 4 main parameters. Using the AHP technique, the priorities of the parameters and agricultural landscape classes and the relationships between basic parameters and visual preferences were determined. In this direction, the questions; What are the priorities of parameters that are effective in determining the visual quality of agricultural landscapes on the basis of expert approach?; What kind of changes have occurred in agricultural landscapes during the years 1990-2000-2006-2012-2018 in 9 subclasses created according to the CLC classes? and; How should the visual landscape quality values of the agricultural landscape subclasses created according to the CLC classes be ranked? The results of the study can be used as a tool in landscape planning and management studies as a factor in strengthening landscape quality.
References
Agnoletti, M. and Santoro, A. (2015). Cultural values and sustainable forest management: The case of Europe.J. For. Res., 20, 438–444. DOI: 10.1007/s10310-015-0500-7
Anadolu Ajansı (2024). https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/yasam/tekirdagda-aycicegi-tarlalari-suruculere-renkli-rota-sunuyor/2634214
Antrop, M. (2005). Why Landscapes of the Past Are Important for the Future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70, 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002
Arriaza, M. Cañas-Ortega, J.F. , Cañas-Madueño, J.A. & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 115–125. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.029
Artsdatabanken (2021). Hvorfinnes de truede artene?https://artsdatabanken.no/rodlisteforarter2021/Resultater/Hvorfinnesdetrueteartene.
Aşur, F., Deniz, S.S. & Yazıcı, K. (2020). Visual Preferences Assessment of Landscape Character Types Using Data Mining Methods (Apriori Algorithm): The Case of Altınsaç and Inkoy (Van/Turkey). J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 22(1): 24 7-260.
Ayuga-Téllez, E., Ramírez-Montoro, J.J., Grande-Ortiz, M.Á. & Muñoz-Violero, D. (2021). Differences in Visual Preference in Rural Landscapes on the Plain of La Mancha in Spain. Sustainability, 13, 13799. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132413799
Bennett, A.F., Radford, J.Q. & Haslem, A. (2006). Properties of land mosaics: implications for nature agricultural landscapes. Biodiversity and Conservation, 22 (12), 2735–2750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0562-9
Berrittella, M., La Franca, L. & Zito, P. (2009). An analytic hierarchy process for ranking operating costs of low cost and full service airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 15(5), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2008.11.006
Bizim Sakarya Gazete, (2024). https://www.bizimsakarya.com.tr/tekirdagin-sari-kanola-tarlalari-fotograf-cektirmek-isteyenleri-agirliyor
Bunce, R. G. H. (2001). An environmental classification of European landscapes, in: B. W. Green, B.Green & W. Vos (Eds)Threatened Landscapes: Conserving Cultural Environments, Ch. 3, 31–40 (London and New York: Spon Press)
Butler, C.D. and Oluoch Kosura, W. (2006). Linking future ecosystem services and future human well-being. Ecology and Society, 11( 1): 30. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art30/. DOI: 10.5751/ES-01602-110130
Cañas, I. (1995). Valoración del Paisaje; E.T.S.I. Agrónomos de Lugo: Lugo, Spain.
Chan, K.M., Guerry, A.D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., Bostrom, A., Chuenpagdee, R., Gould, R. & Halpern, B.S. (2012). Where Are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement. BioScience, 62, 744–756. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7
Chen, J-C., Fan, X-R., Fan, Lai, X-Z., Li, G-L. & Li, F-B. (2023). Visual Harmony of the Proportion of Water and Greenery in Urban Streams: Baxi Stream, Yongan City, China. Water, 15(2), 341; https://doi.org/10.3390/w15020341
Cheng, C. H., Yang, K. L. & Hwang, C. L., (1999), “Evaluating Attack Helicopters by AHP Based on Linguistic Variable Weight”, European Journal of Operational Research, 116, 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00156-8
Çoban, V. (2023). Analysis of Consistency Indices of Pairwise Comparison Methods. Erzincan Üniversitesi Erzincan University Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi Journal of Science and Technology 2023, 16(2), 384-405.https://doi.org/10.18185/erzifbed.1241221
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, J. R. M., Braat, L., Hein, L. G., & Willemen, L. L. J. M. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
Disperati, L. and Virdis, S. G. P. (2015). Assessment of land-use and land-cover changes from 1965 to 2014 in Tam Giang-Cau Hai Lagoon, central Vietnam. Applied Geography, Volume 58, March 2015, Pages 48-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.012
Dramstad, W. E., Fry, G., Gjellstad, W. J., Skar, B., Helliksen, W., Sollund, M. L. B., Tveit, M. S.,Geelmuyden, A. K. & Framstad, K. (2001). Integrating landscape base values: Norwegian monitoring ofagricultural landscapes,Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, pp. 257–268. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00208-0
Elsevier Scopus, (2024). http://www.scopus.com
Erdi Yakan, O. (2018). Güzelcehisar (Bartın İli) Kıyı Yerleşiminde Görsel Peyzaj Değerlendirmesi. Bartın Ün. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
European Comissión (2005). Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural polic. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2005:252:0028:0037:EN:PDF.
European Commission. Rural Development Programms for 2021–2027. (2020). Available online: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/ common-agricultural-policy/rural-development_en
European Cultural Heritage Strategy for the 21st Century (2017). Council of Europe. Available online: https://www.coe.int/en/ web/culture-and-heritage/strategy-21
European Green Deal. (2020). European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/ strategy- and- policy/ priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
Forman, R.T. (1995). Land Mosaics: the Ecology of Landscapes and Regions. Cambridge University. DOI: 10.2307/2266037
Frontuto, V., Corsi, A., Novelli, S., Gullino, P. & Larcher, F. (2020). The visual impact of agricultural sheds on rural landscapes: The willingness to pay for mitigation solutions and treatment effects. Land Use Policy. 91, 104337. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104337
Gazete Arena, (2024). https://www.gazetearena.com/dogaya-aykiri-rengiyle-fotografseverlerin-ugrak-noktasi-oluyor/5852/
Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems. (2002). United Nations’ Food and Agricultural Organization. Available online: https://www.fao.org/events/detail/20-years-of-globally-important-agricultural-heritage-systems
Gobster, P.H., Nassauer, J.I., Daniel, T.C. & Fry, G. (2007). The shared landscape: what does aesthetics have to do with ecology? Landsc. Ecol., 22, 959-972, DOI: 10.1007/s10980-007-9110-x
Gonzalo, F.and Hermann, M. (2014). Visual Quality: an Examination of a South American Mediterranean Landscape, Andean Foothills East of Santiago (Chile). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13: 261–271. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.01.006
Górka, A. (2024). Assessment of Alterations in Settlement Patterns of Agricultural Landscape in the Example of Kashubia in Poland. Sustainability, 16(2), 904; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020904 .
Häfner, K., Zasada, I., van Zanten, B.T., Ungaro, F., Koetse & M., Piorr, A. (2018). Assessing landscape preferences: a visual choice experiment in the agricultural region of Märkische Schweiz, Germany, Landscape Research, 43:6, 846-861. DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1386289
Howley, P., Donoghue, C.O. & Hynes, S. (2012). Exploring Public Preferences for Traditional Farming Landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2012, 104, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.09.006
Hurley, P.T.and Walker, P.A. (2004). Whose Vision? Conspiracy Theory and Land-Use Planning in Nevada County, California. Environ. Plan. A, 36, 1529–1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01281-z ·
Jongeneel, R.A., Polman, N.B.P. & Slangen, L.H.G. (2008). Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional? Land Use Policy, 25 (2008), pp. 81-94, DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.03.00
Jonsen, I.D. and Fahrig, L. (1997). Response of generalist and specialist insect herbivores to landscape spatial structure Landsc. Ecol., 12,185-197, DOI: 10.1023/A:1007961006232
Junge, X., Schüpbach, B., Walter, T., Schmid, B., & Lindemann-Matthies, P. (2015). Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.010
Kalivoda, O., Vojar, J., Skˇrivanov´ a & Z., Zahradník, D., (2014). Consensus in landscape preference judgments: the effects of landscape visual aesthetic quality and respondents’ characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 137, 36–44. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.009
Kalkınma Galerisi, (2024). Kalkınma Ajansları Medya merkezi. https://www.kalkinmagalerisi.org.tr/image/celtik-yeni-karpuzlu-ovasi/1344
Karfrut Meyve Üretim ve Pazarlama (2024). https://www.karfrut.com.tr/
Kiper, T. (2023). Tarımsal Peyzaj Konulu Çalışmaların Niceliksel Açıdan Analizi. Tarım Ormen ve Su Bilimlerinde Öncü ve Çağdaş Yaklaşımlar. S. 225-246.
Kiper, T., Korkut, A. &Topal, T.Ü. (2017). Görsel Peyzaj Kalite Değerlendirmesi: Kıyıköy Örneği. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi. Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi, 20(3): 258-269. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksudobil.289463
Krause, C. L. (2001) Our visual landscape: managing the landscape under special consideration of visualaspects, Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, pp. 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00139-6
Krøgli, S.O., Aune-Lundberg, L. & Dramstad, W.E. (2023). Presence of agriculture in photos of Norwegian landscapesuploaded to Flickr.Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of GeographyVol. 77, 243–254. ISSN 0029-195
Kumaraswamy, S. and Kunte, K. (2013). Integrating biodiversity and conservation with modern Germany. Ecosystem Services, 31, 296–307. Retrieved from https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.015
Leal, J.E. (2020). AHP-express: a simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method, Methods, 7, 100748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021
Luo, Y., He, J., Long , Y., Xu, L., Zhang , L., Tang, Z., Li, C. & Xiong, X. (2023). The Relationship between the Color Landscape Characteristics of Autumn Plant Communities and Public Aesthetics in Urban Parks in Changsha, China. Sustainability, 15(4), 3119; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043119.
Meeus, J. H. A. (1993) The transformation of agricultural landscapes in Western Europe,The Science ofthe Total Environment, 129, pp. 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-9697(93)90169-7
Molnarova, K.J., Bohnet,I.J. & Svobodova, K. (2023). Does Increasing Farm Plot Size Influence the Visual Quality of Everyday Agricultural Landscapes? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 20(1): 687. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010687
Olsson, G.A. and Rønningen, K. 1999. Environmental Values in Norwegian Agricultural Landscapes.
Özdağoğlu, A. and Özdağoğlu, G. (2008). Analysıs of Student Selectıon Crıterıa for Erasmus Program by Using Fuzzy-AHP H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 26, Sayı 2, 2008, s. 213-237.
Özgeriş, M. ve Karahan, F. (2022). Kültürel miras bağlamında tarımsal teraslar ve özellikleri: Uzundere (Erzurum) örneğinde bir değerlendirme. Millî Folklor, 34 (133): 160-175. DOI: 160 - 175, 22.03.2022
Pant, S., Kumar, A, Ram, M., Klochkov, Y. & Sharma, H.K. (2022). Consistency indices in analytic hierarchy process: a review, Mathematics, 10 (8), 1206. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081206
Paracchini, M.L., Capitani, C., Schmidt, A., Andersen, E., Wascher, D.M., Jones, P.J. &Pinto Correia,Piorr, H.P. (2003). Environmental Policy, Agri-Environmental Indicators and Landscape Indicators. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 98, 17–33.
Pouta, E., Grammatikopoulou , I., Hurme , T., Soini, K. & Uusitalo, M. (2014). Assessing the Quality of Agricultural Landscape Change with Multiple Dimensions. Land 2014, 3, 598-616; doi:10.3390/ land3030598
Power, A.G. (2010). Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 365 (2010), pp. 2959-2971, DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.014
Principles Concerning Rural Landscapes as Heritage. (2017). International Council on Monuments and Sites International Federation of Landscape Architects. Adopted by the 19th ICOMS General Assembly, New Delhi, India, 15 December 2017. https://www.icomos.org/ images
Rechtman, O. (2013). Visual Perception of AgriculturalCultivated Landscapes: Key Componentsas Predictors for Landscape Preferences. Landscape Research, 2013 Vol. 38, No. 3, 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2012.672639
Robinson, E.H., Li, M.H. &Manning, B.B. (2001). A practical guide to nutrition, feeds, and feeding of channel catfish (second revision). Mississipi Agri-cultural and Forestry Experimental Station Bulletin 1113, Office of Agricultural Communications, Mississipi.
Saaty, R.W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used, Math. Model. 9 (3-5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to Make a Decision: the Analytic Hierarchy Process”, European Journal of Operation Research, 48: 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York).
Saaty, T.L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J. Math. Psychol. 15 (3) 234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Saaty, T.L. (1996) The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
Schaich, H. , Bieling, C. & Plieninger T. (2010). Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research. GAIA, 4 , 269-277. DOI: 10.14512/gaia.19.4.9
Serée, L., S. Legras, F. Chiron, M. Valantin-Morison, & A. Gardarin (2023). People prefer arable fields and flower strips with continuous soil cover and diversified vegetation. Ecology and Society 28(2):9. DOI: 10.5751/ES-14098-280209
Stobbelaar, D. J., Hendriks, K. & Stortelder, A. (2004). Phenology of the landscape: The role of organic agriculture. Landscape Research 29, 153-179. http:// doi: 10.1080/01426390410001690374
Stokstad, G., Krøgli, S.O. & Dramstad, W.E. (2020). The look of agricultural landscapes–How do non-crop landscapeelements contribute to visual preferences in a large-scale agricultural landscape?Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift–Norwegian Journal of Geography, 74, 111–122. DOI: 10.1080/00291951.2020.1754284
T. C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı (2024). Corine Arazi örtüsü Sınıfları. https://corine.tarimorman.gov.tr/corineportal/araziortususiniflari.html
T.C. Trakya Kalkınma Ajansı, (2024). https://www.trakyaka.org.tr/upload/Node/35522/xfiles/TEKIRDAG_YATIRIM.pdf
Tarolli,P., Wang,W., Pijl, A., Cucchiaro, S. & Straffelini, E., (2023). Heroic viticulture: Environmental and socioeconomic challenges of unique heritage landscapes. iScience. 2023 Jul 21; 26(7): 107125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107125
Teh, M.Z., Abdullah, M., Pugi, N.A. & Rahman, N.A. (2018). Visual Landscape Assessment : A method for analysing and planning for landscape structure . Asian Journal of Quality of Life, 3(14): 33-40. DOI: 10.21834/ajqol.v3i14.181
Tekirdağ İli 2022 Yılı Tarım Raporu, (2023). https://tekirdag.tarimorman.gov.tr/Belgeler/ Tarim Raporlari/2021%20TARIM%20RAPORU.pdf.
TešićA; D. (2022). Corıne Land Cover Change Detectıon In Serbıa And Bosnıa And Herzegovına. Researches Reviews of the Department of Geography, Tourism and Hotel Management. 51–2/2022. DOI: 10.5937/ZbDght2202098T
The Agenda for Sustainable Development 2030, (2015). UNMS (United Nations Member States). Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda.
Van Zanten, B.T., Verburg, P.H., Espinosa, M., Gomez-y-Paloma, S., Galimberti, G., Kantelhardt, J., Kapfer, M., Lefebvre, M., Manrique, R. & Piorr, A. (2014). European Agricultural Landscapes, Common Agricultural Policy and Ecosystem Services: A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev, 34, 309–325. DOI: 10.1007/s13593-013-0183-4
Verburg, P. H., van Asselen, S., van der Zanden, E. H., & Stehfest, E. (2013). The representation of landscapes in global scale assessments of environmental change. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1067–1080. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-012-9745-0
Walker, P. and Fortmann, L. (2003). Whose Landscape? A Political Ecology of the ‘Exurban’Sierra. Cult. Geogr. 10, 469–491. DOI: 10.1191/1474474003eu285oa
Wang, Q., Yang, X., Liu, X. & Furuya, K. (2024). Rice Terrace Experience in Japan: An Ode to the Beauty of Seasonality and Nostalgia. Land, 13, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/ land13010064
Wang, Z.and Marafa, L. (2021). Tourism Imaginary and Landscape at Heritage Site: A Case in Honghe Hani Rice Terraces, China. Land 2021, 10, 439. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10040439
Wartmann, F.M., Frick, J. Kienast, F. & Hunziker, M. (2021). Factors Influencing Visual Landscape Quality Perceived by the Public. Results from a National Survey. Landsc. Urban Plan., 208, 104024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.104024
Web of Science, (2024). http://www.webofknowledge.com
Zhang, W., Ricketts, T.H., Kremen, C., Carney, K. & Swinton, S.M. (2007). Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol. Econ., 64, 253-260, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.024.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
