Interaction of Cropping Pattern and Fertility Treatments on Yield and Sustainability of Mixed Cropping System under Moisture Regime

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i4.657-664.5390

Keywords:

multiple cropping, sole-crop, mixed-crop, integrated nutrient management, interaction effects

Abstract

The farmers in most regions of Pakistan are heavily reliant on traditional farming approaches all year round and tend to cultivate exhaustive crops like wheat, cotton, maize, and sugarcane in most areas of the country. Consistently adopting this system leads to depleting the soil fertility status, which they overcome by instigating an uneconomical way of using excessive chemical fertilizers to maximize crop yields. These fertilizers are truly acidic and adversely affect soil health. Adopting sustainable farming approaches by the incorporation of legumes into the farming system with an integrated nutrient supply restores soil fertility and maintains the sustainability of the agro-ecosystem. A field experiment was performed to determine the significance of the integrated source of nutrient management on the growth and yield of sole and mixed cultures of sorghum and mungbean crops in areas with moisture regimes. The fertility treatments applied to the sole and intercrops of sorghum and mung-bean in a given sequence; i) Control, ii) Compost @ 10 t/ha, iii) FYM @ 20 t/ha, iv) NP @ 40 kg N + 30 kg P2O5 ha-1, v) ½ of recommended Compost @ 5 t/ha + ½ of recommended NP @ 20 kg N & 15 kg P2O5 ha-1, vi) ½ of recommended FYM @ 10 t/ha + ½ of recommended NP @ 20 kg N & 15 kg P2O5 ha-1. The sole crop of mungbean gave a maximum grain yield of 2229.1 kg/ha over an intercrop of 1779.7 kg/ha. Similarly, the highest grain yield of 2779.8 kg/ha of sorghum was obtained in sole culture over its intercrop of 2150.9 kg/ha. The interaction effect of cropping pattern and fertility treatments showed that sorghum and mungbean gave significant results for growth and yield parameters where a combined dose of organic & mineral fertilizers were provided in comparison to the plots where these fertilizers were applied in split doses.

Author Biographies

Ghufran Yousaf, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop & Food Sciences, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, 46300

Agricultural Graduate currently serving in this sector as Field Officer. Agri. Researcher.

Fahad Ali Fayyaz, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop & Food Sciences, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, 46300

Agricultural Graduate currently working as a Research Associate in an agri. based project

Muhammad Hassan Yousaf, Department of Chemistry, Lahore Garrison University, 54792, Lahore

Working as a soil chemist

References

Abbas G, Abbas Z, Aslam M, Malik AU, Ishaque M, Hussain F. 2011. Effects of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) Yield under Arid Climate. Int. Res. J. Plant Sci., 2(4), 094-098.

Amanullah, Khan AA, Nawab K, Khan A, Islam B. 2007. Growth Characters and Fodder Production Potential of Sorghum Varieties under Irrigated Conditions. Sarhad J. Agric., 23(2).

Armin W, Zaman AU, K, Zamil SS, Rabin MH, Bhadra AK, Khatun F. 2016. Combined Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on the Growth and Yield of Mungbean (Bari Mung 6). Intl. J. Sci. & Resear. Public., 6(7).

Arsalan M, Ahmed S, Chauhdary JN, Sarwar M. 2016. Effect of vermicompost and phosphorus on crop growth and nutrient uptake in mungbean. J. Appl. Agric. Biotechnol., 1(2): 38−47.

Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center (AVRDC), The World Vegetable Center, 2016. Annual Report, Shanhua, Taiwan.

Asim M, Aslam M, Hashmi NI, Kisana NS. 2006. Mungbean (Vigna radiata) in Wheat based Cropping System: An Option for Resource Conservation under Rainfed Ecosystem. Wheat Programme, National Agricultural Research Centre, Park Road, Islamabad, Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot., 37(4): 1197-1204.

Assefa Y, Staggenborg SA, Prasad VPV. 2010. Grain Sorghum Water Requirement and Responses to Drought Stress: A Review. Online. Crop Management Research. doi:10.1094/CM-2010-1109-01-RV.

Bonke V, Musshoff O. 2020. Understanding German farmer’s intention to adopt mixed cropping using the theory of planned behavior. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-020-00653-0

Chicco D, Warrens MJ, Jurman G. 2021. The coefficient of determination R-squared is more informative than SMAPE, MAE, MAPE, MSE and RMSE in regression analysis evaluation. PeerJ Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.623

El Sheikha A. 2016. Mixing Manure with Chemical Fertilizers, Why? and What is After? Nutr. Food Technol. 2(1): http://dx.doi.org/10.16966/2470-6086.112

Gaba S, Lescourret F, Boudsocq S, Enjalbert J, Hinsinger P, Journet EP, Navas ML, Wery J, Louarn G, Malezieux E, Pelzer E, Prudent M, Ozier-Lafontaine H. 2015. Multiple cropping systems as drivers for providing multiple ecosystem services: from concepts to design. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-014-0272-z

Habib N, Tahir A, Ain Q ul. 2013. Current Situation and Future Outlook of Sorghum Area and Production in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 3(5): 283-289.

Himanen SJ, Mäkinen H, Rimhanen K, Savikko R. 2016. Engaging Farmers in Climate Change Adaptation Planning: Assessing Intercropping as a Means to Support Farm Adaptive Capacity. Agriculture, 6(3): 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture6030034

Imran, Khan AA, Inam I, Ahmad F. 2016. Yield and yield attributes of Mungbean (Vignaradiata L.) cultivars as affected by phosphorous levels under different tillage systems. Cogent Food & Agriculture, DOI: 10.1080/23311932.2016.1151982

Iqbal A, Khalil IA, Ateeq N, Khan MS. 2006. Nutritional quality of important food legumes. Food Chemistry, 97(2): 331-335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.05.011

Jat LK, Singh YV, Meena SK, Meena SK, Parihar M, Meena RK, Meena VS. 2015. Does Integrated Nutrient Management, Enhance Agricultural Productivity? J. Pure Appl. Microbio, 9(2), 1211-1221.

Ju Q, Ouyang F, Gu S, Qiao F, Yang Q, Qu M, Ge F. 2019. Strip intercropping peanut with maize for peanut aphid biological control and yield enhancement. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 286: 106682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106682

Kaur V, Singh R. 2017. Effect of Different Planting Pattern and Nitrogen Management in Pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.) + Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) Intercropping System. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.606.227

Liu L, Xu X, Zhuang D, Chen X, Li S. 2013. Changes in the Potential Multiple Cropping System in Response to Climate Change in China from 1960–2010. PLoS ONE 8(12): e80990. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080990

Lupwayi NZ, Clayton GW, O'Donovan JT, Grant CA. 2011. Soil Microbial Response to Nitrogen Rate and Placement and Barley Seeding Rate under No Till. Soils, Agronomy & Environmental Quality, 103(4): 1064-1071. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2010.0334

Mahfouz H, Ali AMM, Megawer EA, Mahmoud AS. 2015. Response of Growth Parameters, Forage Quality and Yield of Dual-Purpose Sorghum to Re-Growth and Different Levels of FYM and N Fertilizers in New Reclaimed Soil. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 4(11): 762-782.

Rachie KO, Roberts LM. 1974. Grain Legumes of the Lowland Tropics. Advances in Agronomy, 26, 1-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60869-X

Rashid A, Khan R, Farooq MA. 2004. Effect of legume intercropping on sorghum production. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 41(3/4): 109.

Reddy BVS, Ramesh S, Longvah T. 2005. Prospects of breeding for micronutrients and b-carotene-dense sorghums. International Sorghum and Millets Newsletter, 46: 10-14. http:// doi.org/1210/1/ISMN-46_10-14_2005

Rehman AU, Khan ME, Kaukab S, Saeed S, Aqeel M, Riasat G, Rafiq Ch. M. 2019. Prospects of Mungbean as an Additional Crop in Rice Wheat System of Punjab Pakistan. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(3): 136-141, DOI: 10.13189/ujar.2019.070303.

Sahoo RK, Bhardwaj D, Tuteja N. 2013. Biofertilizers: A Sustainable Eco-Friendly Agricultural Approach to Crop Improvement. In: Tuteja N, Singh Gill S. (editors). Plant Acclimation to Environmental Stress. New York NY, Springer. pp. 403-432. ISBN: 978-1-4614-5000-9 (Print) 978-1-4614-5001-6 (Online).

Savci S. 2012. An Agricultural Pollutant: Chemical Fertilizer. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3(1): 77-80, DOI: 191-X30004%.

Shaker-Koohi S, Nasrollahzadeh S. 2014. Evaluation of yield and advantage indices of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) intercropping systems. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biom. Res., 2(1): 151-160.

Shen Q, Chu G. 2004. Bi-directional nitrogen transfer in an intercropping system of peanut with rice cultivated in aerobic soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 40: 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0737-3

Singh VP, Chhabra A, Kharb, RPS. 1988. Production and utilization of mungbean in India. In: Shanmugasundaram S, McLean BT (editors). Mungbean: proceedings of the second international symposium, Shanhua Taiwan, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, AVRDC, pp: 486-497. ISBN 92-9058-035-6 (Online).

Teferra TF, Awika JM. 2019. Sorghum as a Healthy Global Food Security Crop: Opportunities and Challenges. Cereal Foods World, 64(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/CFW-64-5-0054

Thirumaran AS, Seralathan MA. 1988. Utilization of mungbean. In: Shanmugasundaram S, McLean BT (editors). Mungbean: proceedings of the second international symposium, Shanhua Taiwan, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, AVRDC, pp: 470-485. ISBN 92-9058-035-6 (Online).

Downloads

Published

23.04.2023

How to Cite

Yousaf, G., Fayyaz, F. A., & Yousaf, M. H. (2023). Interaction of Cropping Pattern and Fertility Treatments on Yield and Sustainability of Mixed Cropping System under Moisture Regime. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 11(4), 657–664. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i4.657-664.5390

Issue

Section

Research Paper