Comparison of the Development and Involution Periods of Bursa of Fabricius with Histological and Histochemical Methods

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i8.1324-1330.5928

Keywords:

Bursa Fabricii, development, involution, histochemical, histological

Abstract

The aim of this study is to histologically and histochemically determine the developmental and involutional stages of bursa of Fabricius of henna partridge (Alectoris chukar). In the study, bursa of Fabricius of 12 3-month-old (6 males, 6 females), 12 6-month-old (6 males, 6 females) henna partridges purchased from a private farm were used. It was observed that bursa of Fabricius was surrounded by a connective tissue capsule and consisted of tunica serosa, tunica muscularis, and tunica mucosa layers from the outside to the inside. It was seen that the tunica muscularis consisted of outer longitudinal and inner circular smooth muscle fibers. It was observed that the tunica mucosa made plicae towards the lumen of the organ and consisted of 10-15 plicae. It was seen that lamina epithelialis and lymph follicles were present in each plica. It was determined that the lamina epithelialis consisted of two parts called FAE (Follicle-Associated Epithelium) and IFE (İnter Follicular Epithelium). It was noted that the lymph follicles contained cortex and medulla sections and were separated locally by capillaries together with cortical medullary boundry cells. In the Methyl Green-pyronin staining method, plasma cells were found in the bursa of Fabricius of the henna partridge, in the connective tissue surrounding the organ, around the blood vessels and inside the follicles. In AB pH=2.5 staining, AB-positive reaction was seen only in the apical part of the epithelial cells forming FAE and IFE in the pre- and post-involution period. In PAS staining, PAS-positive reaction was observed only in the apical part of the epithelial cells forming FAE and IFE in the pre- and post-involution period. In PAS/AB pH=2.5 combined staining method, AB-positive reaction was observed only in the apical part of epithelial cells in the pre- and post-involution period. As a result of this study, it was found that bursa of Fabricius of the henna partridge did not undergo any histochemical changes despite its histologically large differences after involution.

References

Butcher GD, Harms RH, Winterfield RW, 1989. Relationship between delayed onset of egg production and involution of the bursa of Fabricius in White Leghorn chickens. Avian Dis, 33, 361–4.

Ciriaco E, Gagliardi ME, Cicciarello R, Germana G, Bronzetti P, 1985. Development of the pigeon bursa of Fabricius. A scanning and transmission electron microscope study. Ann Anat, 159, 55-63.

Ciriaco E, Pinera PP, Diaz-Esnal B, Laura L, 2003. Age-related changes in the avian primary lymphoid organs (thymus and bursa of Fabricius). Microsc Res Techniq, 62, 251-253.

Doğuer S, Erençin Z, 1964. Evcil Kuşların Komparatif Anatomisi. Ankara, Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, s. 41-2.

Dirik D, 2011. “Kaya keklikleri (Alectoris graeca)’nde kuluçka sonrası on iki haftalık dönemde bursa Fabricii’de görülen ışık mikroskopik değişiklikler”. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Ünv Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.

Glick B, 1956. Normal growth of the bursa of Fabricius in chickens. Poultry Sci, 35, 843-51.

Gülmez N, Aslan Ş, 1999. Histological and Histometrical Investigations on Bursa of Fabricius and Thymus of Native Geese. Tr J of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 23,163-171.

Hashimoto Y ve Sugimura M, 1976. Histologia and quantitative studies on the postnatal growt of the thymus and the bursa of fabricius of white pekin ducks. Jap J vet, 65-76.

Hodges RD, 1974. The Histology of the Fowl. London, Academic Press, p. 205-21.

Hupaya JR, 1995. “Evaluacion de la bursa de fabricio en pollos broilers”, Estudio anatomohistologico Thesis. Peru.

Khenenou T, Melizi M, Benzaoui H, 2012. Morpho-histological Study of the Bursa of Fabricius of Broiler Chickens during Post-hashing Age. International Journal of Biological, Biomolecular, Agricultural, Food and Biotechnological Engineering, 6, 12.

Kocaöz N, 1993. “Pre ve postnatal dönemlerdeki kanatlı bursa fabriciisi (Cloacal bursa) üzerinde ışık mikroskobik çalışmalar”. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Selçuk Ünv Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Konya.Le Douarin NM, Dieterlen-Lievre F and Oliver PD, 1984. Ontogeny of primary lymphoid organs and lymphoid stem cell. Am J Anat, 170, 261-99.

Kocaöz N, Çelik İ, Ünsal S, 1997. Tavuk bursa Fabricii’sinin embriyonel gelişmesi üzerine ışık mikroskobik çalışmalar. SÜ Vet Bil Derg, 13, 43-51.

Le Douarin NM, Dieterlen-Lievre F and Oliver PD, 1984. Ontogeny of primary lymphoid organs and lymphoid stem cell. Am J Anat, 170, 261-99.

Lillie RD, 1965. İn Histopathologic Technic and Practical Histochemistry. 3rd ed blakiston, New York.

Mallory FB, 1900. A contribution to staining methods: I. A differential stain for connective-tissue fibrillae and reticulum. J Exp Med, 5, 15-20.

McLelland J, 1990. A Colour Atlas of Avian Anatomy. London, Wolfe Publishing Ltd, p, 84.

McManus JFA, 1946. Histological demonstrationof mucin after periodic acid. Nature, London, 158: 202.

Mercer-Oltjen SL, Woodard AE, 1987. Development of the bursa of Fabricius in the partridge and pheasant. Poult Sci, 5, 413–21.

Milicevic Z, Vujic D, Isakovic K, Micic M, Milicevic NM, 1986. Involution of bursa of Fabricius in male and female chickens: a light microscopic histoquantitative study. Poult Sci, 65, 18-23.

Mowry RW, 1956. Observations on the use of sulphuric ether for the sulphation of hydroxyl groups in tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem, 4, 407.

Onyeanusi BI, Ezeokoli CD, Onyeanusi JC, Ema AN, 1993. The anatomy of the cloacal bursa (bursa of Fabricius) in the helmeted guinea fowl (Numida meleagris galeata). Anat Histol Embriyol, 22, 212-21.

Pappenheim A, 1899. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die elementare Zusammensetzung des Rothen Knockenmarkes einiger Säugenthiere. Virchows Archiv fur Pathologische Anatomie Physiologie, 157, 19.

Sarı EK, Kurtdede N, 2007. Light and Electron Microscopic Studies of the Bursa of Fabricius in Turkeys. Kafkas Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 13, 177-184.

Scott JE, Dorling J, 1965. Differential staining of acid glycosaminoglycans (mucopolysaccharides) by alcian blue in salt solutions. Histochemie, 5, 221-233.

Downloads

Published

31.08.2023

How to Cite

Yaren Kuloğlu, H., & Boydak, M. (2023). Comparison of the Development and Involution Periods of Bursa of Fabricius with Histological and Histochemical Methods. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 11(8), 1324–1330. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i8.1324-1330.5928

Issue

Section

Research Paper