Comparison of Some Spraying Characteristics by Testing Different Spray Nozzle Positions on Artificial Cotton Plants when Defoliant Application

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i4.785-790.5948

Keywords:

Defoliant, conventional hollow cone, coverage rate, droplet size, tracer deposit

Abstract

In this study, limit application rates and different spray nozzle positions effects on coverage rate, drop diameter and amount of tracer residue values were determined of application defoliating agent before machine harvest on cotton plant. Researches were carried on two phases as indoor area trials and laboratory analysis. In these researches, artificial cotton plants were used. Indoor area trials were conducted two different application rates (20 and 40 L da-1) and three different in spray nozzle positions (NP1, NP2 and NP3) by using conventional hollow cone spray nozzle. 27 pieces of sampling area were determined that they were included the two sides of the plant and plant center position of the upper-middle-lower in initiative area on plants. Six initiative areas were determined in order to record efficiency in initiative area on plants. For the purpose of deposition of trace amounts of substances were determined in sampling area; water-sensitive paper is placed on top that included both over the leaves and beneath the leaves in order to detect each filter paper, and drop diameter, rate of coverage. The amount of deposit on areas that were done analysis in laboratory conditions was determined to with spectrophotometer. Drop diameters and coverage rate detection were done analysis on image analysis. According to the results, it is determined that NP3 which is used generally in 40 L da-1 norm provide the best deposition and coverage rate on applications of defoliant, in addition to pesticide reach on leaf beneath in merely this spray nozzle position.

Author Biography

Keziban Yalçın Dokumacı, Selcuk University, Faculty of Agriculture, Dept. of Agricultural Machinery and Technologies Engineering, 42130, Konya

Araştırma Görevlisi Doktor

References

Anonymus 2011. Bayer Crop Science Türkiye [www.bayercropscience.com.tr/urun_detay], Erişim Tarihi: 24.03.2011.

Bainer R, Kepner RA, Barger EL. 1977. Tarım Makinalarının Esasları, (Çev. Y. Özemir ve T. Kurtay), İ.T.Ü Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Yayınları No: 116, 449- 468, İstanbul.

Chaudhry MR. 1997. Harvesting and ginning of cotton in the world. International Cotton Advisory Committee, Washington, D.C, pp. 5. Available at: https://www.icac. org/cotton_info/speeches/Chaudhry/BW97.PDF.

Denizdurduran N. 2008. Kahramanmaraş Koşullarında Yaprak Döktürücü Uygulama Zamanlarının Pamukta (G. hirsutum L.) Verim ve Kalite Özelliklerine Etkisi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Kahramanmaraş.

Fox RD, Derksen RC, Cooper JA, Krause CR, Ozkan HE. 2003. Visual and image system measurement of spray deposits using water-sensitive paper. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 19(5): 549-552. 2003 American Society and Agricultural Engineers (ASAE), ISSN 0883-8542.

Güler H. 2002. Değişik Hava Akımı ve İlaç Püskürtme Yönlerinin Tele Alınmış Bağlarda İlaç Dağılım Düzgünlüğüne Olan Etkileri. Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Doktora Tezi), İzmir.

Kara Z, Yazar K, Doğan O, Sabir A, Özer A. 2018. Induction of ploidy in some grapevine genotypes by N2O treatments. In XXX International Horticultural Congress IHC2018: International Symposium on Viticulture: Primary Production and Processing 1276 (pp. 239-246).

Tokel D. 2021. Dünya pamuk tarımı ve ekonomiye katkısı. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 10(2): 1022-1034.

TÜİK. 2023. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu [http://www.tuik.gov.tr/]. Erişim Tarihi: 14.02.2023.

USDA. 2021. United States Department of Agriculture. Cotton: World Market and Trade. Published on Jan, 2021. Retrieved from: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/cotton.pdf

Yağcıoğlu K. 2008. Bitki Koruma Makinaları Ders Kitabı. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 508, Bornova-İzmir, 256s.

Yalçın İ. 1999. Değişik Toprak İşleme ve Pamuk Ekim Tekniklerini Aydın Yöresi Koşullarına Uygulama Olanakları. Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Doktora Tezi), İzmir.

Downloads

Published

26.04.2023

How to Cite

Yalçın Dokumacı, K., & Özarslan, C. (2023). Comparison of Some Spraying Characteristics by Testing Different Spray Nozzle Positions on Artificial Cotton Plants when Defoliant Application. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 11(4), 785–790. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i4.785-790.5948

Issue

Section

Research Paper