Water-Yield Relationships of Potato in Mediterranean Climatic Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i10.1986-1993.6098Keywords:
Potato, agria, tuber yield, deficit irrigation, ıspartaAbstract
This study was carried out in Isparta University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Research, and Application Farm in 2021 to determine the effect of different irrigation water levels on tuber yield and quality parameters of the Agria potato variety. Drip irrigation method was used in the study and five different irrigation water levels (S1: 120% of the seven-day ETo, S2: 90% of the seven-day ETo, S3: 60% of the seven-day ETo, S4: 30% of the seven-day ETo, S5: No irrigation except germination and emergence) were determined based on the reference evapotranspiration (ETo). Irrigation water (IW) amounts varied between 85.66-639.26 mm and evapotranspiration varied between 296.54-825.15 mm. Different amounts of IW significantly affected the vegetative growth, yield and quality parameters of potato. As irrigation water decreased, total tuber yield and marketable yield declined. Total tuber yield and marketable yield were 46.11 t/ha and 40.59 t/ha, respectively, in S1 treatment where the maximum amount of IW was applied, while they were 12.96 t/ha and 6.37 t/ha, respectively, in S5 treatment where no irrigation was applied. Logarithmic relationships were determined between evapotranspiration and total yield and between the amount of IW and total yield. Water use efficiency was determined between 43.69-55.88 kg/(ha×mm) and irrigation water use efficiency between 32.34-51.86 kg/(ha×mm) and yield response factor (ky) was calculated as 1.19.
References
Ahuja S, Khurana DS, Singh K. 2019. Soil matric potential-based irrigation scheduling to potato in the Northwestern Indian plains. Agricultural Research, 8(3): 320-330.
Akram MM, Asif M, Rasheed S, Rafique MA. 2020. Effect of drip and furrow irrigation on yield, water productivity and ecomomics of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) grown under semiarid conditions. Science Letters, 8(2):48–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47262/SL/8.2.132020004
Aksic M, Gudzic S, Deleti´c N, Gudzic N, Stojkovic S, Knezevic J. 2014. Tuber yield and evapotranspiration of potato depending on soil matric potential. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20: 122–126.
Anonymous, 2018. Isparta İli Çevre Durum Raporu. Isparta Çevre ve Şehircilik İl Müdürlüğü. https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/ced/icerikler/isparta_-cdr2018-20190704114736.pdf [ Accessed 10 january 2022]
Anonymous, 2022 Agria Tohum Özellikleri. https://artarim.com/tr/urun/agria [Accessed 23 December 2022]
Ayas S, Korukçu A. 2010. Water-yield relationships in deficit irrigated potato. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Uludag University, 24(2): 23-36.
Badr MA, Abou Hussein SD, El-Tohamy WA, Gruda N. 2010. Efficiency of subsurface drip irrigation for potato production under different dry stress conditions. Gesunde Pflan, 62(2): 63-70.
Bahramloo R, Nasseri A. 2010. Effect of deficit irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of potato cultivar santeh. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 4: 90–98.
Berksan Öf, 2002. Patates Tarımı. Kar Tarım. Ankara
Byrd SA, Rowland D., Bennett J, Zotarelli L, Wright D, Alva A, Nordgaard J. 2014. Reductions in a commercial potato irrigation schedule during tuber bulking in Florida: Physiological, yield, and quality effects. Journal of Crop Improvement, 28(5): 660-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2014.929059
Camargo DC, Montoya F, Córcoles JI, Ortega JF. 2015. Modeling the impacts of irrigation treatments on potato growth and development. Agricultural Water Management, 150: 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.11.017
Cantore V, Wassar F, Yamaç SS, Sellami MH, Albrizio R, Stellacci AM, Todorovic M. 2014. Yield and water use efficiency of early potato grown under different irrigation regimes. International Journal of Plant Production, 8(3): 409–428.
Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. 1979. Yield Response to Water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage. Paper 33, 257.
El-Abedin TKZ, Mattar MA, Alazba AA. Al-Ghobari HM. 2017. Comparative effects of two water-saving irrigation techniques on soil water status, yield, and water use efficiency in potato. Scientia Horticulturae, 225: 525-532.
Er C, Uranbey S. 1998. Nişasta ve Şeker Bitkileri. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları. Vol.1504.
Erdem T, Erdem Y, Orta H, Okursoy H. 2006. Water- yield relationships of potato under different irrigation methods and regimens. Scientia Agricola, 63, 226-231.
Ertek A, Kanber R. 2001. Pamukta uygun sulama dozu ve aralığının pan evaporasyon yöntemiyle belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture, 24(2000): 293–300.
Eskandari A, Khazaie HR, Nezami A, Kafi M, Majdabadi A, Soufizadeh S. 2013. Effects of drip irrigation regimes on potato tuber yield and quality. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 59(6): 889-897.
Essah SY, Andales AA, Bauder TA, Holm DG. 2020. Response of Two Colorado Russet Potato Cultivars to Reduced Irrigation Water Use. American Journal of Potato Research, 97(3): 221-233.
Fabeiro CMDSOF, de Santa Olalla FM, de Juan A. 2001. Yield and size of deficit irrigated potatoes. Agricultural Water Management, 48(3): 255–266.
FAO, 2008. Potato and Water Resources; Hidden Treasure: International Year of the Potato. http://www.potato2008.org/en/potato/water.html [Accessed 22 December 2020]
FAO, 2012. Crop yield response to water. https://www.fao.org/3/i2800e00.htm [Accessed 24 January 2023)
FAO, 2021. Production quantities of crops in the world. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL [Accessed 11 January 2023]
Gültekin R, Ertek A 2018. Effects of deficit irrigation on the potato tuber development and quality. International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Food Sciences, 2(3): 93-98.
Hassanpanah D. 2010. Evaluation of potato cultivars for resistance against water deficit stress under in vivo conditions. Potato Research, 53(4): 383–392.
Hassanpanah D, Hassanabadi H, Azizi Chakherchaman SH. 2011. Evaluation of cooking quality characteristics of advanced clones and potato cultivars. American Journal of Food Technology, 6(1): 72-79.
Howell TA, Cuenca RH, Solomon KH. 1990. Crop yield response management of farm irrigation systems. In American Society of Agricultural Engineers. pp. 93-312.
IIisulu K. 1957. Potato Industry in Turkey. American Potato J., 34 97–105.
İncekara F. 1973. Endüstri Bitkileri ve Islahı. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi.
James LG. 1988. Principles of farm irrigation systems design. John Wiley and Sons Limited.
Karam F, Amacha N, Fahed S, El Asmar T, Domínguez A. 2014. Response of potato to full and deficit irrigation under semiarid climate: Agronomic and economic implications. Agricultural Water Management, 142: 144–151.
Karadoğan T. 1990. Farklı Gelişme Dönemlerinde Değişik Seviyelerde Sulama ve Su Kesme Zamanlarının Patatesin Verim ve Unsurlarına Etkileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. PhD Dissertation. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.
Karataş MC. 2018. Sulama Rejiminin Tatlı Patates (Ipomoea batatas L.) Çeşitlerinde Büyüme, Verim ve Kalite Parametrelerine Etkisinin Belirlenmesi ve Su Stresi Koşullarında Bitki Enerji Kullanımının Hiperspektral Ölçümlerle İlişkilendirilmesi MSc Thesis. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
Kashyap PS, Panda RK. 2003. Effect of irrigation scheduling on potato crop parameters under water stressed conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 59(1): 49–66.
Kızıloğlu FM, Sahin U, Tun T, Diler S. 2006. The Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Potato Evapotranspiration and. Journal of Agronomy, 5(2): 284-288.
Meligy MM, Abou-Hadid A, El-Shinawy MZ, El-Behairy U. 2020. Impact of climate change on water requirements and the productivity on potato crop. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture, 47(1): 57-68.
Mubarak, Janat M, Makhlou M. 2018. Response of two potato varieties to irrigation methods in the dry Mediterranean area. Agriculture/Pol’nohospodárstvo, 57–64(2).
Nouri A, Nezami A, Kafi M, Hassanpanah D. 2016. Growth and yield response of potato genotypes to deficit irrigation. International Journal of Plant Production, 10(2): 139-157.
Önder D, Önder S, Çalişkan ME, Çalişkan S. 2015. Influence of different irrigation methods and irrigation levels on water use efficiency, yield, and yield attributes of sweet potatoes. Fresenius Environmental Bulletinl, 24: 3398-3403.
Ross CW. 2006. The effect of subsoiling and irrigation on potato production. Soil Tillage Research, 7: 315–325.
Salimi K, Hosseini NM, Hosseini MB, Siosemardeh A. 2017. The efficacy of regulated deficit and partial root zone rrying irrigation strategies on yield and water use efficiency of potato. Agricultural Communications, 5(3).
Salih SA, Abdulrahman FA, Mahmood YA. 2018. The effect irrigation interval on tuber yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research, 3(2): 27-31.
Stewart JI, Hagan M, Pruitt WO. 1976. Production functions and predicted irrigation programs for principal crops as required for water resources planning and increased water use efficiency. Tech. Bureau Recl. , 14-06-D-7329: 79–80.
Şenol S. 1973. Patates muhafazasında, sıcaklık, müddet, yumru özgül ağırlığı ve çeşit özelliğinin yumruda şeker, kuru madde ve cips kalitesine etkisi. Atatürk Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayını, 159: 49–76.
Ünlü M, Kanber R, Şenyiğit U, Onaran H, Diker K. 2006. Trickle and sprinkler irrigation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in the Middle Anatolian Region in Turkey. Agricultural Water Management, 79(1): 43–71.
Yavuz D, Kara M, Suheri S. 2012. Comparison of different irrigation methods in terms of water use and yield in potato farming. J. Selcuk Univ. Nat. Appl. Sci, 2: 1-12.
Yuan BZ, Nishiyama S, Kang Y. 2003. Effects of different irrigation regimes on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated potato. Agricultural Water Management, 63(3) 153–167.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
