Determination of Yield and Quality Characteristics of Some Fodder Beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. rapa) Varieties in Sakarya Ecological Conditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i4.493-499.6708Keywords:
Fodder beet, tuber yield, leaf yield, protein ratio, sugar ratioAbstract
This research; it was established under the Sakarya ecological conditions and carried out for 2 years between 2021 and 2023 to determine the yield and quality characteristics of some fodder beet varieties. The experiment was set up with four replications in a randomized blocks trial design. Rekord, Rota, Ursus and Zentaur varieties were used in this research. In the study; in tubers; length (cm), diameter (cm), aboveground length ratio (%), yield (kg/da), dry matter content (%), dry matter yield (kg/da), crude protein ratio (%), sugar ratio (%) and weight loss in storage (%) and in leaves; yield (kg/da), length (cm), width (cm), dry matter ratio (%), dry matter yield (kg/da) and crude protein ratio (%) properties were investigated. The most positive data in the study were obtained from the Ursus variety (In tuber: length; 29.1 cm, yield; 19.309 kg/da, dry matter content; 15.9%, crude protein ratio; 9.30%, sugar ratio; 6.35%, and in leaves; length; 61.0 cm, yield; 2.585 kg/da, dry matter content; 14.0%, crude protein ratio; 23.5%).
References
Abou-Deya, I.B. (1991). Productivity of Some Fodder Beet Cultivars as Influenced by Organic and Mineral Fertilizers Under Saline Conditions of South Sinai. Annual of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor Zagazig University, 29 (1): 29-35.
Acar, R. (2000). Effects of Different Planting Times and Plant Densities on Yield, Yield Components, and Quality in Some Fodder Beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. rapacea Koch.) Varieties. (PhD Thesis) Selçuk University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Konya, 173 p.
Acikgoz, E. (2021). Forage Crops. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Volume II, ISBN: 978-625-8451-03-0; 888 p.
Acikgoz, N., Ilker, E. & Gokcol, A. (2004). Evaluation of Biological Researches on Computer. Ege University, TOTEMSTAT, Izmir, ISBN: 973-483-607-8.
Adiyaman, M. (2003). Determination of Suitable Fodder Beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. rapacea Koch.) Varieties for Different Climate Regions and Researches on Yield Components and Storage Characteristics. (PhD Thesis) Ege University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, İzmir, 160 p.
Akyildiz, A. R. (1986). Feed Science and Technology. Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications, No: 974, Ankara University Press, 410 p.
Akyildiz, A. R. (2004). Feed Science and Laboratory Guide. Ankara Univ., Faculty of Agriculture Publications, No: 895, Application Guide 213, Ankara University Press, 210 p, Ankara.
Albayrak, S. & Yuksel, O., (2009). Leaf Area Prediction Model for Sugar Beet and Fodder Beet. Süleyman Demirel University, Journal of Institute of Natural Sciences, 13-1 (2009),20-24, Doi:10.19113/sdufbed.62433.
Anonymous, (2002). State Variety Trials in Thuringia-Fodder Beet-Report 2001. Thuringia for Agriculture, Nature Conservation and Environment, http://www.tll.de/ainfo/pdf/lvfrub.pdf31.12.2002.
Anonymous, (2024). TUIK. Plant Production Statistics. Date of Access, 02.01.2024. http://www.www.tuik.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1001.
Avcioglu, R. & Sabanci, I. (1993). Fodder Beet. Plus Yield Magazine, December 1993, (1)4, 11 p.
Bartolomaeus, W. (1988). Comparative Yield Studies with Fodder Beet and Sugar Beet on D-Type Sites. Field Crop Abstract, (43), 330-343.
Brohi, A. R. & Aydeniz, A. (1991). Fertilizers and Fertilization. Cumhuriyet University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications: 10, Textbook: 3, Tokat, 880 p.
Cristiansen-Weniger, F., Horn, V. & Jung, L. (1979). Soil Conservation and Agricultural Measures for the Preservation of Endangered Turkish Soils as well as for Increasing Forage Plant Cultivation and Animal Production. Giessen, 216 p.
Celik, A., (2013). Effects of Forage Crops Support on Sowing and Production in Turkey. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies, Department of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, Ankara.
Cetin, Y. & Ozhan, R. (1992). Effects of Various Dosages of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers on Forage Beet Yield. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Mandacilik Research Institute, 161 p.
Cetin, Y. (1998). Cultivation of Forage Beet. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Journal, 123, 53-53 p, Ankara.
Elmali, Y. (1998). Research on the Effect of Different Planting Times and Densities on Yield and Other Characteristics in Fodder Beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. rapacea Koch.). (Master's Thesis) Ege Univ., Inst. of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Izmir, 94 p.
Ergul, M. (1988). Feed Science and Technology. Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications, No: 487, 318 p, Bornova-Izmir, ISBN: 9789754835281.
Genckan, M. S. (1983). Forage Crop Farming. Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture Publications, No: 417, 519 p, Bornova-Izmir.
Geren, H. (1996). Effects of Different Planting Times on Yield and Some Other Characteristics of Various Fodder Beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. rapacea Koch.) Varieties. (Master's Thesis) Ege Univ., Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Izmir, 111 p.
Hofman, W., Mudra A. & Plarre, W. (1970). Textbook of Breeding of Agricultural Crops. (Volume 2: Special Part), Paul Parey Publishing House, Berlin and Hamburg, 442, 361 p, ISBN: 10: 3489709101.
Jankowiak, J., Sikora, M. & Bienkowski, J. (1988). Response of Fodder Beet to Sprinkler Irrigation as Related to Stand Density and Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates. Pamietnik Pulawski, 91: 109-121, Polish (Field Crop Abstract 1990), ISBN: 043-08988.
Kampf, R. Nohe, E. Petzoldt K. & Sneyd, J. (1985). Field Forage Production. DLG Verlags-Gmbh, Rüster Str. 13, D-6000, Frankfurt Main, 95 p.
Kokten, K., & Ozdemir, A. M. (2020). Determination of Leaf Yield and Quality Features Different Fodder Beet (Beta vulgaris var. rapacea) Varieties. Turkish Journal of Range and Forage Science, 1(1), 23-27. e-ISSN: 2718-0492.
Manga, I., Acar, Z., Ayan, I., Tiryaki, I. & Ozyazıcı, M. A. (1997). Effects of Different Fertilizers, Planting Times, and Plant Densities on Yield and Some Quality Characteristics of Fodder Beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. rapa) Grown under Dry and Irrigated Conditions in Samsun. 2nd Field Crops Congress, September 22-25, 1997, Samsun, 482-486 s.
Oz, A. (1997). The Effect of Different Planting Times on Yield and Some Yield Characteristics of Fodder Beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. rapacea Koch.) at Different Altitudes. (Master's Thesis) Ege Univ., Ins. of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Field Crops, Izmir, 111 p.
Ozdemir, A., & Kokten, K. (2020). Tuber Yield and Quality Features of Some Fodder Beet (Beta vulgaris var. rapacea) Varieties. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 10(3), 2191-2198. Doi: 10.21597/jist.734273.
Salisbury, F. B. & Ross, C.W. (1992). Plant Physiology, Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, California-USA, 261 p, ISBN: 0534151620.
Sedlmayr, T. (1966). Guidelines for the Conduct of Fodder Beet Variety Trials. Jaensch-Peragis Rübensucht KG, Einbeck, 361 p, ISSN: 1431–1089.
Senf, G. (1961). Observations in the Fields of Breeding, Multiplication, and Cultivation of Beta Beets in the People's Republic of Hungary. Scientific, Abh., Germany Acad., Agricultural Sci., No: 54, 33-55 p, Berlin.
Soya, H., Avcioglu, R., & Geren, H. (1997). Cultivation of Fodder Beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. rapacea Koch.). Chamber of Agricultural Engineers Izmir Branch Bulletin, January-February, Izmir, 11 p.
Voighlander, G. & Jacob, H. (1987). Grassland Farming and Forage Production. Eugen Ulmer GmbH and Co., Wollgrasweg 41, 7000 Stuttgart 70 (Hohenheim), 370 p, ISBN: 3- 8001-3071-8.
Yilmaz, M. (2018). Determination of Yield and Quality Characteristics of Some Fodder Beet Varieties in Sakarya/Pamukova Ecological Conditions. Journal of Sakarya University Institute of Science and Technology, 22 (3), 977-985, Doi 10.16984/saufenbilder.356492.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
