Readability of Electronic and Visual Ear Tags in Hair Goat Kids

Authors

  • Ferda Karakuş Department of Animal Science, Agriculture Faculty, Yüzüncü Yıl University, 65080 Van
  • Ayşe Özge Demir Department of Animal Science, Agriculture Faculty, Yüzüncü Yıl University, 65080 Van
  • Suna Akkol Department of Animal Science, Agriculture Faculty, Yüzüncü Yıl University, 65080 Van
  • Adem Düzgün Van Directorate of Provincial Food Agriculture and Livestock, 65080 Van
  • Murat Karakuş Van Directorate of Provincial Food Agriculture and Livestock, 65080 Van

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v4i5.407-410.675

Keywords:

Animal traceability, Ear tag, Electronic identification

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the readability of electronic and visual ear tags in hair goat kids managed under extensive conditions. A total of 74 kids were identified with electronic and visual ear tags at birth. Readability of electronic and visual ear tags was 97.3% and 94.6% in static conditions at the end of 7 months, and 96.8% and 93.5% at the end of the first year after tagging, respectively. No breakages and electronic failures occurred during this study. Infected ear rate in electronic and visual ear tags was 45.9% and 17.6%, respectively. Under the conditions of this study, electronic and visual ear tags did not fulfill the International Committee for Animal Recording (ICAR) requirements (readability >98%) for an official animal identification device at the end of the first year after tagging. Therefore, low animal traceability with electronic and visual ear tags was determined by this study.

Author Biography

Ferda Karakuş, Department of Animal Science, Agriculture Faculty, Yüzüncü Yıl University, 65080 Van

Animal Science

References

Abecia JA, Palacin I. 2014. Use of electronic leg tags for identification of small ruminants. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz, 33(3): 783-790.

Caja G, Carne S, Salama AAK, Ait-Saidi A, Rojas-Olivares MA, Rovai M, Capote J, Castro N, Argüello A, Ayadi M, Aljumaah R, Alshaikh MA. 2014. State-of-the-art of electronic identification techniques and applications in goats. Small Ruminant Res, 121: 42-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.05.012

Caja G, Conill C, Nehring R, Ribo O. 1999. Development of a ceramic bolus for the permanent electronic identification of sheep, goat and cattle. Comput Electron Agric, 24(1-2): 45-63. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00036-8

Carne S, Caja G, Ghirardi JJ, Salama AAK. 2009a. Long-term performance of visual and electronic identification devices in dairy goats. J Dairy Sci, 92: 1500-1511. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1577

Carne S, Caja G, Ghirardi JJ, Salama AAK. 2011. Modeling the retention of rumen boluses for the electronic identification of goats. J Dairy Sci, 94(2): 716-726. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3210

Carne S, Caja G, Rojas-Olivares MA, Salama AAK. 2010. Readability of visual and electronic leg tags versus rumen boluses and electronic ear tags for the permanent identification of dairy goats. J Dairy Sci, 93(11): 5157-5166. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3188

Carne S, Gipson TA, Rovai M, Merkel RC, Caja G. 2009b. Extended field test on the use of visual ear tags and electronic boluses for the identification of different goat breeds in the United States. J Anim Sci, 87(7): 2419-2427. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1670

Cox DR. 1972. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J Roy Stat Soc B, 34(2): 187-220.

Huber PA. 2004. Use of electronic identification in practical conditions on livestock. The 11th International Conference of the Association of Institutions for Tropical Veterinary Medicine and 16th Veterinary Association Malaysia Congress. Petaling Jaya, Malaysia, pp: 110-112.

ICAR (International Committee for Animal Recording). 2012. International agreement of recording practices. Guidelines approved by the General Assembly held in Cork, Ireland.

ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1996a. Radio-frequency identification of animals-code structure, ISO 11784:1996 (E), 2nd Ed., Geneva.

ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 1996b. Radio-frequency identification of animals-technical concept, ISO 11785:1996 (E), 1st Ed., Geneva.

Karakus F, Demir AÖ, Akkol S, Düzgün A, Karakus M. 2015. Performance of electronic and visual ear tags in lambs under extensive conditions in Turkey. Arch Anim Breed, 58: 287-292. DOI: 10.5194/aab-58-287-2015

Kowalski LH, Monteiro ALG, Hentz F, Prado OR, Kulik CH, Fernandes SR, da Silva CJA. 2014. Electronic and visual identification devices for adult goats reared in semi-intensive system. Rev Bras Zootecn, 43(2): 100-104. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982014000200008

SAS. 2005. SAS/STAT User‘s Guide: Version 9.3. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

SPSS. 2002. SPSS for Windows advanced statistics release 11.5v, Chicago, IL, USA.

Downloads

Published

15.05.2016

How to Cite

Karakuş, F., Demir, A. Özge, Akkol, S., Düzgün, A., & Karakuş, M. (2016). Readability of Electronic and Visual Ear Tags in Hair Goat Kids. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 4(5), 407–410. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v4i5.407-410.675

Issue

Section

Animal Production