Effect of Crop Geometry and Weed Management Practices on Yield and Yield Attributes of Spring Maize in Banke, Nepal

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i10.1668-1672.6842

Keywords:

Atrazine, cob length, hand weeding, kernels, mulching

Abstract

The experiment was conducted in Banke, Nepal, from February 2021 to May 2021 to find suitable spacing and weed management practices for spring maize. The experiment was conducted in a split-plot design in which main plots consisting of two spacings (S1:60 cm × 25 cm and S2:60 cm × 30 cm) and subplots consisting of five weed management practices as, W1: weedy check, W2: weed free, W3: atrazine @ 2 kg a.i. ha-1 as pre-emergence herbicide, W4: atrazine as pre-emergence herbicide followed by single-hand weeding at 30 DAS, and W5: straw mulch. Observations were taken for different parameters, that are, cob length, cob circumference, number of grains per cob, number of ears per hectare, thousand-grain weight, and grain yield. Based on spacing non-significant variations were found for all traits except for the number of ears per hectare. The highest number of ears per hectare (61667 ears ha-1) was found in S1 (60 cm × 25 cm). Based on weed management practices all the traits were significantly different, except the number of ears per hectare and thousand grain weight. The highest value of grain yield (6.15 mt ha-1) was found in straw mulch, and the lowest grain yield (3.72 mt ha-1) was found in the weedy check. A positive correlation was observed between yield and different weed management practices (WEM) (r = 0.5**) and other yield-attributing traits, that are, number of ears per hectare (NE) (r = 0.62**), the number of grains per cob (NK) (r = 0.82**), cob length (CL) (r = 0.47**), cob diameter (CD) (r = 0.68**), and total grain weight (TGW) (r = 0.52**). A negative correlation was observed between yield and spacing (S) (r = -0.41*).

Author Biography

Shankar Paudel, Aathrai Rural Municipality, Plant Protection Officer, Terhathum, Nepal

Plant Protection Officer

References

Andrade, F. H., Calviño, P., Cirilo, A., & Barbieri, P. (2002). Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal, 94(5), 975–980.

Dahal, S., & Karki, T. B. (2014). Conservation agriculture-based practices affect the weed dynamics in spring maize. World Journal of Agricultural Research, 2(6A), 25–33.

Deshmukh, L., Jadhav, A., Jathure, R., & Raskar, S. (2009). Effect of nutrient and weed management on weed growth and productivity of kharif maize under rainfed condition. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 22(4), 889–891.

Dobariya, A., V. K. and Mathukia, R. K. and Gohil, B. S. and Shivran. (2015). Integrated weed management in rabi sweet corn (Zea mays var. Saccharata). Journal of Eco-friendly Agriculture, 10(1), 70–73.

KC, Govind & Karki, Tika & Shrestha, Jiban & Achhami, Buddhi. (2015). Status and prospects of maize research in Nepal. Journal of Maize Research and Development, 1, 1-9.

Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development (MoALD). (2020). Krishi Diary 2080 . https://aitc.gov.np/en/resources /t02u8l1dz23abqozzz3vlvntvbgta1reos0xbzy9

Murphy, S. D., Yakubu, Y., Weise, S. F., & Swanton, C. J. (1996). Effect of planting patterns and inter-row cultivation on competition between corn (Zea mays) and late emerging weeds. Weed Science, 44(4), 865–870.

Pant, C., Sah, S. K., Marahatta, S., & Dhakal, S. (2021). Weed dynamics in no-till maize system and its management: A review. Agronomy Journal of Nepal, 5(01), 168–177.

Raut, S. K., Ghimire, S. K., Kharel, R., Kuwar, C. B., Sapkota, M., & Kushwaha, U. K. S. (2017). Study of yield and yield attributing traits of maize. American Journal of Food Science and Health, 3(6), 123–129.

Reddy, M. M., Padmaja, B., Veeranna, G., & Reddy, D. V. V. (2012). Bio-efficacy and economics of herbicide mixtures in zero-till maize (Zea mays) grown after rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agronomy, 57(3), 255–258.

Shanka, A. S., & Arba, Y. (2021). Evaluation of Maize Crop Water Requirement Under Changing Climate over Konso, Southern Ethiopia.Environmental Analysis & Ecology Studies ,8 (1), 856–863. https://doi.org/10.31031/EAES.2021.08.000679

Sharma, S., Marahattha, S., Sah, S. K., & Karki, T. B. (2018). Efficacy of different tillage and weed management practices on phenology and yield of winter maize (Zea mays L.) in Chitwan, Nepal. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 26(2), 1-11.

Shrestha, A., Thapa, B., & Kandel, S. (2019). Assessment of different weed management practices in yield and yield attributes in summer maize in inner Terai of Nepal. Journal of Research in Weed Science, 2(3), 224-229.

Shrivastav, N., Dhakal, M., Amgain, L. P., & Karki, T. B. (2015). Weed dynamics and productivity of spring maize under different tillage and weed management methods. Azarian Journal of Agriculture, 2(5), 118–122.

Singh, K., Kaur, T., Bhullar, M. S., & Brar, A. S. (2018). The Critical period for weed control in spring maize in North-West India. Maydica, 61(1), 7.

Singh, Ganesh & Kumar, Satish & Singh, Rajesh & Singh, S.S. (2015). Growth and yield of Baby Corn (Zea Mays L.) as influenced by varieties, spacings, and dates of sowing. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, 49, 353.

Singh, R., Sharma, A., & Bewera, U. (2007). Tillage and crop establishment practices for improving the productivity of maize (Zea map) under different weed control methods. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 77(11).

Downloads

Published

15.10.2024

How to Cite

Belbase, N. P., Paudel, S., & Yadav, R. (2024). Effect of Crop Geometry and Weed Management Practices on Yield and Yield Attributes of Spring Maize in Banke, Nepal. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 12(10), 1668–1672. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i10.1668-1672.6842

Issue

Section

Research Paper