Comparison of Different Twin Row and Narrow Row Sowing Methods in Corn A Clay-Textured Soil

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12is1.2121-2127.7140

Keywords:

Dent corn, Twin row, Narrow row, Line abreast, Diagonal

Abstract

Narrow and twin row sowing methods are agronomic applications that aim to increase plant growth and yield by expanding the plant's growing area but, they are highly affected by environmental conditions. The aim of this study is to determine the applicability of different narrow row and twin row sowing methods in clay textured soil in main crop cultivation of corn, which an important grain. The study was carried out Diyarbakır province in the Southeastern Anatolia Region of Türkiye in 2016 and 2017. In the study carried out with two different corn varieties, line abreast narrow row, diagonal narrow row, line abreast twin row, diagonal twin row, single row 1 (70 cm row spacing, 20 cm intra-row spacing) and single row 2 (70 cm row spacing, 12.5 cm intra-row spacing) applications were tried. ADA 351 and Sakarya corn varieties were used in the study. As a result it was determined that line abreast narrow row, diagonal narrow row, line abreast twin row and diagonal twin row applications are not suitable for corn cultivation. The highest grain yield was obtained from single row and 12.5 cm intra-row spacing application.

References

Acciares, H. A., & Zuluaga, M. S. (2006). Effect of plant row spacing and herbicide use on weed aboveground biomass and corn grain yield. Planta Daninha, 24, 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582006000200011

Ahmad, M., A. Khaliq, R. Ahmad, & Ranjha, A. M. (2010). Allometery and productivity of autumn planted maize hybrids under narrow row spacing. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, 12, 661-667.

Akkurt, E., & Demirbaş, N. (2021, May 29-30). Evaluation of self-sufficiency in corn production in Turkey. [Conference session]. Plovdiv, Bulgaria. https://www.ibaness.org/conferences/plovdiv_2021/ibaness_plovdiv_proceedings_draft_6.pdf

Balem, Z., Modolo A. J., Trezzi M. M., Vargas T.O., Baesso M. M., Brandelero E. M., & Trogello, E. (2014). Conventional and twin row spacing in different population densities for maize (Zea mays L.). African Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(23), 1787-1792. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2014.8714

Balkcom, K. S., Satterwhite J. L., Arriaga F. J., Price A. J., & Van Santen, E. (2011). Conventional and glyphosate-resistant maize yields across plant densities in single-and twin-row configurations. Field Crops Research, 120(3), 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2010.10.013

Barbieri, P. A., Echeverría H. E., Saínz Rozas H. R., & Andrade, F. H. (2008). Nitrogen use efficiency in maize as affected by nitrogen availability and row spacing. Agronomy Journal, 100(4): 1094-1100. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0057

Fuksa, P., Hrevušová, Z., Szabó, O., & Hakl, J. (2023). Effect of row spacing and plant density on silage maize growth, dry matter distribution and yield. Agronomy, 13(4), 1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041117

Gözübenli, H., Kilinc M., Sener O., & Konuskan, O. (2004). Effects of single and twin row planting on yield and yield components in maize. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, 3(2), 203-206. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2004.203.206

Greveniotis, V., Zotis S., Sioki E., & Ipsilandis, C. (2019). Field population density effects on field yield and morphological characteristics of maize. Agriculture, 9(7), 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9070160

Haegele, J. W., Becker R. J., Henninger A. S., & Below, F. E. (2014). Row arrangement, phosphorus fertility, and hybrid contributions to managing increased plant density of maize. Agronomy Journal, 106(5), 1838-1846. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0382

Karayel, D. (2010). Evaluation of seed distribution in the horizontal plane and plant growing area for row seeding using voronoi polygons. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16(2), 97-103. (Turkish)

Kırılmaz, H. (2018). Effects of twin row sowing application on yield and yield parameters in seed corn production. (Publication No. 519750) [Master’s dissertation, Selçuk University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Koşar, N. (2015). Effect of twin row, narrow row and single row sowing systems to yield and yield characteristics of corn plant (Zea mays L. indentata). (Publication No. 444108) [Master’s dissertation, Harran University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Kratochvil, R. J., & Taylor, R. W. (2005). Twin‐row corn production: An evaluation in the mid‐Atlantic Delmarva region. Crop Management, 4(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1094/CM-2005-0906-01-RS

Lancaster, S. H., & Adee, E. (2023). Effect of corn row spacing on herbicide effectiveness for weed control in 2022. Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports, 9(4), 11. https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.8470

Maddonni, G. A., Cirilo A. G., & Otegui, M. E. (2006). Row width and maize grain yield. Agronomy Journal, 98(6), 1532-1543. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0038

Murdia, L. K., Wadhwani R., Wadhawan N., Bajpai P., & Shekhawat, S. (2016). Maize utilization in India: an overview. American Journal of Food and Nutrition, 4(6), 169-176. DOI: 10.12691/ajfn-4-6-5

Novacek, M. J. (2011). Twin-row production and optimal plant population for modern maize hybrids. (Publication No. 34) [Master’s dissertation, Nebraska University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Prasanna, B. M. (2012). Diversity in global maize germplasm: characterization and utilization. Journal of Biosciences, 37(5), 843-855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-012-9227-1

Özcan, S. (2009). Corn, indispensable crop of the modern World: Contribution of genetically modified (transgenic) corn on agricultural production. Turkish Journal of Scientific Reviews, 2(2), 01-34. (Turkish)

Öztürk, A., Özata E., Erdal Ş., & Pamukçu, M. (2019). Utilization and future of special corn types in Turkey. International Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Agricultural Research, 2(1), 75-90. (Turkish)

Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry,General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policy, Maize Research Institute, (2024, November). https://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/misir/Sayfalar/EN/AnaSayfa.aspx

Robles, M., Ciampitti I. A., & Vyn, T. J. (2012). Responses of maize hybrids to twin‐row spatial arrangement at multiple plant densities. Agronomy Journal, 104(6), 1747-1756. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0231

Stone, P., Pearson A., Sorensen I., & Rogers, B. (2000). Effect of row spacing and plant population on maize yield and quality. Agronomy New Zealand, 30, 67-75.

Şahin, S. (2001). Distribution of corn cultivation areas in Türkiye and corn production. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 21(1). (Turkish)

Turhal, K. (2021). Effects on maize (Zea mays L.) production of sowing areas and yields per years in Turkey. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 5(2), 418-425. (Turkish) https://doi.org/10.46291/ISPECJASvol5iss2pp418-425

Turkish State Meteorological Service, (2024, November). https://www.mgm.gov.tr

Turkish Statistical Institute, (2023, March). https://www.tuik.gov.tr/

Vural, Ç. (2007). Drip irrigation of corn in the Aydın region. (Publication No. 200663) [Master’s dissertation, Adnan Menderes University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.

Downloads

Published

08.12.2024

How to Cite

Kolay, B., Avşar, Özlem, Bilge, U., Berekatoğlu, K., Kılınç, S., Oğurlu, F., Atakul, Şehmus, Çelik, Y., Eren, A., & Öztürkmen, A. R. (2024). Comparison of Different Twin Row and Narrow Row Sowing Methods in Corn A Clay-Textured Soil. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 12(s1), 2121–2127. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12is1.2121-2127.7140