Molecular Diversity Analysis of in vitro and Irradiated Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) Grew Under Salt Stress Expressed by SCoT and ISSR Markers

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i8.1308-1317.6144

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Genetic markers - Gamma irradiation - In vitro - Mutation - Salinity

Özet

Tomato buds of cv. Idkawy were cultured in vitro on solid MS medium with 0.2 mg-l BAP. The plantlets that were produced were exposed to different doses of gamma radiation, ranging from 100 to 200 Gy. Afterward, single pieces of nodes were cut and moved to a fresh MS medium with 0.2 mg-l of BAP. The gamma radiation caused a mortality rate of 18.75% to 52.5% among the explants. The surviving plantlets were then cut into single node pieces and transferred to an MS medium containing 0.2 mg-l of BAP, with added NaCl concentrations of either 50 or 100 mM. There was increased mortality of the vegetative buds on the explants with increased salt concentrations. It was shown that the all gamma radiation doses caused reduced the percentage of survival at saline levels. The genetic diversity was assessment by using ten primers for each SCoT and ISSR markers to six irradiated treatments grew under salt stress (100 Gy x 50 mM, 150 Gy x 50 mM, 200 Gy x 50 mM, 100 Gy x 100 mM, 150 Gy x 100 mM, 200 Gy x 100 mM). It was showed that the polymorphism percentage mean of SCoT marker (29.56%) is higher than the ISSR marker (26.78%). The average of PIC values for both markers SCoT and ISSR were 0.197 and 0.288 (PIC ˂0.5), as well as, MI values were 0.077 and 0.081, respectively. In contrast, when considering the number of alleles (Ne), Nei's genetic diversity (H), and Shannon's information index (I) parameters, it was observed that the greatest genetic variation was caused by the combined treatment of 200 Gy x 50 mM NaCl using the SCoT marker. On the other hand, with the ISSR marker, the highest induced genetic variation was seen with the combined treatment of 150 Gy x 50 mM NaCl. The obtained results demonstrate that SCoT marker was more accurate and efficient than ISSR marker for distinguishing and genetic variation analysis of irradiated tomato plantlets grew under salt stress. The relationships within treatments were estimated through cluster analysis (UPGMA) based on SCoT and ISSR analysis.

Referanslar

Anderson J, Ogihara A, Sorrells Y M E, Tanksley S D (1992) Development of a chromosomal arm map for wheat based on RFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 83(8), 1035–1043

Ashraf M, Ozturk M (eds.) (2021). Salinity and Water Stress: Improving Crop Efficiency. Academic Press.

Bhattacharyya P, Kumaria S, Kumar S, Tandon P (2013) Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) marker reveals genetic diversity of Dendrobium nobile Lindl. an endangered medicinal orchid species. Gene, 529: 21–26

Collard BCY, Jahufer MZZ, Brouwer JB, Pang ECK (2005). An introduction to markers, quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping and marker-assisted selection for crop improvement: the basic concepts. Euphytica, 142(1-2), 169-196.

Collard BCY, Mackill DJ (2009). Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple, novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 27(1): 86-93.

El-Fiki A, Fahmy EM, Abo Doma AH, Helmy O, Adly M, El-Metabteb G (2021). THE Genetic variation assessment of in vitro irradiation tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) by SCoT and ISSR markers. J Microbiol Biotech Food Sci., 10(4): 557-565. doi: 10.15414/jmbfs.2021.10.4.557-565

Ezzat A, Adly M, El-Fiki A (2019). Morphological, agronomical and molecular characterization in irradiated Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) and detection by start codon target markers. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 12 (1): 403–412 https://doi.org/10.1080/16878507.2019.1686578

Fahmy EM, Abo Doma AH, Helmy O, El-Fiki A, Gamal El-Metabteb G, Adly M (2020). Molecular study for salt stress in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) using in vitro culture by SCoT and ISSR markers. Egypt. J. Biotechnol. 60: 1- 15.

FAO (2019). Climate change and food security: Risks and responses. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/ca5293en/ca5293en.pdf

Forster BP, Shu QY. (20120 Plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: basic terms and applications. In: Shu QY, Forster BP, Nakagawa H, editors. Plant mutation breeding and biotechnology. Wallingford: CABI; p. 9-20

Gupta PK, Varshney RK (2000). The development and use of microsatellite markers for genetic analysis and plant breeding with emphasis on bread wheat. Euphytica 113(2): 163-185.

Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Alam MM, Roychowdhury R. Fujita M (2013). Physiological, Biochemical, and Molecular Mechanisms of Heat Stress Tolerance in Plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14(5), 9643-9684.

IAEA (2012). Induced Mutations in Plant Breeding and Biological Researches for Sustainable Agriculture. International Atomic Energy Agency. Retrieved from https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/TE-1680_web.pdf

Jazayeri M, Naderi R, Alahdadi I, Mirzai M (2016). Effect of gamma radiation and sodium selenite on the activity of antioxidant enzymes and lipid peroxidation in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) seedlings. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 44(2), 410-415.

Kodym A, Afza R (2003). Physical and chemical mutagenesis. In Plant breeding reviews (pp. 43-82). Springer, Dordrecht.

Kovach WL (1998) MVSP- A multivariate statistical package for windows, ver. 3.1. Pentraeth, Wales: Kovach computing services

Kumar A, Sharma KD (2017). Response of Potato to Abiotic Stresses: A Review. Annals of Plant Sciences, 6(11), 1687-1694.

Lobell DB, Gourdji SM (2012). The influence of climate change on global crop productivity. Plant Physiology, 160(4), 1686-1697.

Madhava Rao KV, Raghavendra AS, Janardhan Reddy K, (2006) Physiology and Molecular Biology of Stress Tolerance in Plants, 41–99. © 2006 Springer. Printed in the Netherlands.

Mittler R (2006). Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends in Plant Science, 11(1), 15-19.

Moustafa S M, Abu El-Nasr A A (2015). Stimulation of gamma rays on seed germination, seedling growth, and protein electrophoresis of Vicia faba L. and Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Cytology and Genetics, 49(6): 365-374.

Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant., 15, 473–497

Pavel AB, Vasile CI (2012) PyElph – A software tool for gel images analysis and phylogenetics. BMC Bioinformatics, (13), 13–19

Pronabananda DAS, Monirul Islam Md, Humayun Kabir Md., Monirul Islam Md, Shariar Islam SAM, Rafiqul Islam Md, Jahan MT, Roy PK, Halder R, Protul K. Roy PK, Mamun ANK, Hossain Md L (2021). Study on the effect of γ-irradiation (Co-60) on seed germination and agronomic traits in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Notulae Scientia Biologicae.13(4): 11061. DOI: 10.15835/nsb13411061

Roșca M, Mihalache G and Stoleru V (2023) Tomato responses to salinity stress: From morphological traits to genetic changes. Front. Plant Sci. 14:1118383. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1118383

Roychowdhury R, Tah J (2013) Mutagenesis a potential approach for crop improvement. In: Hakeem KR, Ahmad P, Ozturk M, editors. Crop improvement: new approaches and modern techniques. New York (NY): Springer; p. 149-187

Taha EH, Shoaib RM (2021). Impact of Gamma Irradiation on Tomato, and Pepper Growth Parameters, Phytochemical, Nematode Infectivity and detection of DNA Damage by Comet Assay. J. of Plant Protection and Pathology, Mansoura Univ., 12 (9): 599 – 608. DOI: 10.21608/jppp.2021.92193.1032

Tiwari S, Singh M (2019). Gamma radiation-induced mutagenesis in crop improvement. In Plant Mutation Breeding and Biotechnology (pp. 143-156). Springer, Singapore.

Ulukapi K (2021). Hormetic effect of gamma irradiation under salt stress condition in Phaseolus vulgaris. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 81(3): 256-269. doi:10.4067/S0718-58392021000300256

USDA (2020). Climate change and agriculture. Retrieved from https://www.usda.gov/topics/climate/climate-change-and-agriculture

Varshney R K, Marcel T C, Ramsay L, Russell J, Röder MS, Stein N, Graner, A (2007) A high density barley microsatellite consensus map with 775 SSR loci. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 114(6), 1091–1103

Villegas D, Sepúlveda C, Ly D (2023). Use of Low-dose Gamma Radiation to Promote the Germination and Early Development in Seeds [Internet]. Seed Biology - New Advances [Working Title]. IntechOpen; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1003137

Xiong F, Zhong R, Han Z, Jing J, He L, Zhuang W, Tang R (2011) Start codon targeted polymorphism for evaluation of functional genetic variation and relationships in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Molecular Biology Reports, 38, 3487–3494

Yadav R, Arora P (2019). Gamma Radiation: A Tool for Crop Improvement. In: Arora, P., & Sharma, A. (Eds.), Plant Genome Engineering with CRISPR Systems (pp. 139-150). Springer.

Yeh FC, Yang RC, Boyle TBJ, Ye ZH, Mao JX (1999) POPGENE. The user friendly software for population genetic analysis.

Yayınlanmış

2024-08-24

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Fahmy, E., Abo Doma, A., Adly, M., El-Metabteb , G., Helmy, O., & El-Fiki, A. (2024). Molecular Diversity Analysis of in vitro and Irradiated Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) Grew Under Salt Stress Expressed by SCoT and ISSR Markers . Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 12(8), 1308–1317. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i8.1308-1317.6144

Sayı

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi