Assessment of Field Performance and Nutritional Quality of Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.) for Food Diversification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12is1.2104-2111.7121Anahtar Kelimeler:
Food diversity- mineral composition- mung bean- sensory properties- seed yieldÖzet
This research was carried out to evaluate the field performance of some mung bean accessions and their nutritional composition for inclusion in household diet. Twenty-one (21) accessions of mung bean were evaluated in the early and late season of 2022 at Ile-Ife, and in the early season at Kishi out-station of the Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (IAR&T), Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria. The experiment was established according to randomized complete block design with three replications. Agronomic and yield data were collected. Six of the mung bean accessions were randomly selected and analyzed for proximate, mineral composition and sensory properties along with two cowpea varieties as standard checks. MB-3, 6, 14 and 15 produced the highest seed yield across the locations (Ile-Ife early season, Ile-Ife late season, and Kishi early season). However, the performance was generally better in the early season than in the late season. The mung bean samples had slightly lower protein values than the standard checks. The mung bean samples had considerably higher mineral levels (p ≤ 0.05) than the control samples. Moin-moin (processed bean cake) made from some of the mung bean samples compared favorably with that from Ife brown cowpea (standard check). This work revealed good adaptability of the mung bean accession to southwest agro-ecology of Nigeria. It also revealed better nutritional quality of mung bean relative to cowpea for inclusion in household meals.
Referanslar
Albrahani, A. A., & Greavis, R. F. (2016). Fat soluble vitamins: clinical indication and current challenges for chromatographic measurements. The Clinical Biochemist Review 37(1), 27-47.
AOAC (2005). Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 18th edition. Washington D.C., USA. ISBN 0-935584-42-0. ISSN 0066-961X
Asfaw, A., Gurum, F., Alemayehu, F., & Rezene Y. (2012). Analysis of multi-environment grain yield trials in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) based on GGE biplot in Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 14(2), 389-398. DOI: https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.5555/20123079730
Aysun, P. (2004). Fresh pod yield and some pod characteristics of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. walp) Genotypes from Turkey. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 3, 269-273.
Belay, F., Meresa, H., Syum, S., & Gebresilasie, A. (2019). Evaluation of improved mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) varieties for yield in the moisture stress conditions of Abergelle Areas, Northern Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science and Practice 4(4), 139-143.
CDCP (1998). Recommendations to prevent iron deficiency in the United States. Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. MMWR Recommendations and Reports 47(RR-3), 1-29.
Deshmukh, S. N., Basu, M. S., & Reddy, P. S. (1986). Genetic variability, character association and path coefficients of quantitative traits in Virginia Bunch varieties of groundnut. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 56, 816-821.
Dias, M. C., Pinto, D. C., & Silva, M. S. (2021). Plant flavonoids: Chemical characteristics and biological activity. Molecules 26 (17), 5377-5382. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26175377
Erbersdoblar, H. F., Berth, C. A., & Jarels, G. (2017). Legumes in human nutrition. Nutrient content and protein quality of pulses. Ernahrungs Umschau 64(9), 134-139. DOI: 10.4455/eu.2017.034
FAO. (2019). The state of the food security and nutrition in the world 2019. Report of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
Ibeogu, I. H., Egbedike, C. N., Ikegwu, O. J., Nwobasi, V. N., & Oledinma, N. U. (2021). Quality characteristics of moin-moin produced from some underutilized legumes. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation 8(3), 6-9.
Kassa, Y., Admasu, D., Tigabe, A., Abie, A., & Mamo. D. (2018). Participatory on farm evaluation of improved mung bean technologies in the low land areas of North Shewa Zone Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development 10(8), 158-164.
Mbeyagala, E. K., Amayo, R. & Obuo, J. E. P. (2016). Adaptation of introduced mung bean genotypes in Uganda. African Crop Science Journal 24, 155-166.
Meena, B. L., Das, S. P., Meena, S. K., Kumari, R., Devi, A. G., & Devi. H. L. (2017). Assessment of GCV, PCV, Heritability and Genetic Advance for Yield and its Components in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.). International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6(5), 1025-1033.
Minh, N. P. (2014). Different factors affecting mung bean (Vigna radiata) tofu production. Research 18(2), 191-200.
Nazanin, R., Richard, H., & Rainer, S. (2013). Zinc and its importance for human health: An integrative review. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 18(2), 144-157.
NBS (2017). CPI and Inflation Report August, 2017. National Bureau of Statistics, Nigeria. Available at: https://nigerianstat.gov.ng/elibrary.
Pataszek, L., Zahir, Z., Ahmad, M., Rani, S., Nahir, R., Schafle, R. et ai. (2018). Beans with benefits- Role of mung bean (Vigna radiata) in a changing environment. American Journal of Plant Science 9 (7), 1577-1600 doi10.4236/ajPS.2018.97115.
Sharma, S. R., Khedar, O. P., Lal, C., Sharma, V., & Varshney. N. (2018). Estimation of Variability Parameters in Mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Genotypes. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 10(14), 6646- 6648.
Shevkani, K., Singh, N., Kaur, A., & Rana, J. C. (2015). Structural and functional characterization of kidney bean and field pea protein isolates: a comparative study. Food Hydrocolloids 43, 679-689. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.07.024
Singh, R. K., & Chaudhary, B. D. (1979). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publishers 314pgs. DOI: 10.2307/2530404
Soliman, G. A. (2019). Dietary fibre, Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular disease. Nutrients 11(5), 1155-1174. DOI: 10.3390/nu11051155.
Sombie, P. A., Compaore, M., Coulibaly, A. Y., Ouedraogo, T., Tignegre, J., & Kiendrebeogo, M. (2018). Antioxidant and phytochemical studies of 31 cowpea genotypes from Burkina fasso. Foods 7(9), 143-148. DOI: 10.3390/foods7090143.
UNICEF (2018). Global Nutrition Report. https//data.unicef.org. Assessed Dec. 2022.
USDHHS. (2019). United States Department of Health Human Services, Dietary Guidelines for Americans. US Department of Agriculture, 2015-2020 Report.
Wang, F., Huang, L., Yuan, X., & Chen, X. (2021). Nutritional, phytochemical and antioxidant properties of 24 mung bean genotypes. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition 3, 28-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-021-00073-x
Yi-Shen, Z., Shuai, S., & Fitz Gerald, R. (2018). Mung bean proteins and peptides: Nutritional, functional and bioactive properties. Food and Nutrition Research 43, 414-431.
Yoseph, T., Mekbib, F., Fenta, B. A., & Tadele, Z. (2022). Genetic Variability, Heritability, and Genetic Advance in Mung Bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Genotypes. Ethiopian Journal of Crop Science 9(2), 113-135.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
