Comparison of In Vitro Gas Production Parameters of Dairy Cow Rations Prepared with Different Meals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i11.2059-2065.6066Keywords:
Ration , Meal , In vitro gas production , In vitro methane production , Organic matter digestibilityAbstract
In this study, in vitro gas production (GP) parameters of rations created using different meals were compared. Soybean meal (SBM) (R1), sunflower meal (SFM) (R2) and canola meal (CM) (R3) were added to the rations as meal. A total of 7 rations were obtained by preparing rations in which these meals were added at different rates (R4, R5, R6 and R7). The difference between the nutritional values of the diets was balanced with maize DDGS. The feed values that make up the ration and the dry matter (DM), ash, crude protein (CP), ether extract (EE), in vitro gas, methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) production amounts of 7 different rations were determined. Organic matter digestibility (OMD), metabolic energy (ME) and net energy lactation (NEL) values were calculated with the obtained in vitro gas production amounts. The amount of gas formed at the 24th hour of the incubation period of SFM, CM and SBM was found to be 31.77, 34.65, 50.34 ml, respectively. Among the groups in which the cakes were added alone, the highest gas production was determined as 59,20 ml in the SBM added R1 group, while the lowest was 50,54 ml in the CM added R3 group. The lowest amount of CH4 was found as 7.77 ml in the SFM added R2 group. It has been determined that the use of bagasses in the same ration produces more CH4 than their use alone. As a result of the research, it has been determined that the proportionally higher addition of SFM to the ration compared to SBM and CM contributes more economically and ecologically and causes an increase in digestibility. In addition, if one of SBM, SFM and CM will be added to the ration, it has been determined that it will be more economical to use SFM.
References
Anonim. 2017. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) İstatistik Bölümü İnternet Sitesi (http://www.fao.org), (Erişim: Mart 2023).
Anonim. 2018. Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade. December, 2018. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. Web Sitesi: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/oilseeds.pdf. Erişim: 24.03.2023.
Anonim. 2021. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TÜİK), Tahıllar ve Diğer Bitkisel Ürünler, Yağlı Tohumlar. Erişim adresi https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Search/Search?text=ya%C4%9Fl%C4%B1%20tohum.
Anonim. 2023. Günlük Yem Fiyatları. Türkiye Odalar ve Borsalar Birliği (TOBB). https://borsa.tobb.org.tr/fiyat_urun_2.php?ana_kod=1.
AOAC. 2006. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Analytical Chemists International. 18th edition. Arlington, V. A. Washington, DC, USA.
Bath DL. 1985. Nutritional requirements and economics of lowering feed costs. of Dairy Science, 68(6), 1579-1584.
Beauchemin KA, Ungerfeld EM, Eckard RJ, Wang M. 2020. Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: Lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation. Animal,14(S1), s2-s16.
Coskuntuna L, Erten K, Koç F. 2022. Toplam Rasyon Karışımının Silolanmasının Aerobik Stabilite Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi. Türk Tarım ve Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi,9(4), 933-942.
FAO. 2018. World food and agriculture. FAO Statistical Yearbook 2013. Rome, Italy: FAO.
Karakuş MÜ. 2014. 12. Uluslararası Yem Kongresi Açılış Konuşması.Türkiye Yem Sanayicileri Birliği Dergisi, 70, 29-40.
Knapp JR, Laur GL, Vadas PA, Weiss WP, Tricarico JM. 2014. Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: Quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. Journal of dairy science, 97(6), 3231-3261.
Menke KH, Steingass H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Develop., 28: 7–55.
Meriç Ş, Koç F. 2021. Mısırdan elde edilmiş kurutulmuş damıtma tane ve çözünürlerin (DDGS) bazı kalite ve risk kriterleri yönünden incelenmesi. Hayvan Bilimi ve Ürünleri Dergisi, 4(1), 96-109.
Morsy TA, Gouda GA, Kholif AE. 2022. In vitro fermentation and production of methane and carbon dioxide from rations containing Moringa oleifera leave silage as a replacement of soybean meal: in vitro assessment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(46), 69743-69752.
Nedelkov K, Slavov T, Cantalapiedra-Hijra G. 2021. Ruminal degradability and intestinal digestibility of dm and cp in high-protein fraction from sunflower meal-a cheap source of dietary protein for ruminants. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci, 9(7), 983-988.
Parlar T, Koç F. 2020. Toplam rasyon karışımı kullanılan bir süt sığırı işletmesinin besleme açısından değerlendirilmesi. Erciyes Tarım ve Hayvan Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 24-32.
Paula EM, da Silva LG, Brandao VLN, Dai X, Faciola AP. 2019. Feeding canola, camelina, and carinata meals to ruminants. Animals, 9(10), 704.
Renna M, Coppa M, Lussiana C, Le Morvan A, Gasco L, Maxin G. 2022. Full-fat insect meals in ruminant nutrition: In vitro rumen fermentation characteristics and lipid biohydrogenation.Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 13(1), 138.
Saxena P. 2011. Optimization techniques for animal diet formulation. Gate2Biotech, 1, 2-5.
Sızmaz Ö, Çalık A, Bundur A. 2021. In vitro fermentation characteristics of camelina meal comparison with soybean meal. Livestock Studies, 61(1), 9-13.
Soysal Mİ. 2000. Biometrinin prensipleri. TÜ Tekirdağ Ziraat Fak. Yayın, (74).
Stoycheva I. 2021. Feeding ewe lambs replacing sunflower meal with soybeans and peas. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science,27(3), 600-603.
Yasir A, Mattoo FA, Ganai AM, Ahmad HA. 2009. Complete feed block technology-a boon to sheep farming. Livestock International,13(1), 4-7.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.