Analysis of Specialization in Agricultural Products After WTO Membership: A Review for Türkiye and Mercosur Countries Agricultural Trade Relation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i12.2514-2523.6978Keywords:
Agriculture, Livestock, Specialization, Turkey, MERCOSURAbstract
The increase in the volume of foreign trade between Türkiye and MERCOSUR countries in recent years has an important potential. The fact that these countries are economically similar further increases the mutual foreign trade potential. These trade relations are important in terms of economic cooperation and are expected to strengthen the economic interests of countries over time. Both Türkiye and MERCOSUR countries have a high potential in terms of production and foreign trade in agricultural and livestock products. Of course, the fact that countries are members of the World Trade Organization has increased free foreign trade in these sectors. Therefore, in this study, the level of foreign trade specialization in the agriculture and livestock sector after Türkiye and MERCOSUR countries became a member of the World Trade Organization was analysed. In this study covering the years 1995-2022; Net Trade, Export-Import Ratio, Lafay and Michaely indices were used. The findings show that the highest specialization is in Argentina and the lowest in Paraguay. In addition, Türkiye and Brazil have an advantage in numerically similar product groups. Türkiye needs to increase productivity in agriculture to increase the level of specialization in foreign trade.
References
Bahta, Y. T., & Mbai, S. (2023). Competitiveness of Namibia’s Agri-Food Commodities: Implications for Food Security. Resources, 12(34), 1-21.
Balassa, B. (1977). Revealed Comparative Advantage Revisited: An Analysis of Relative Export Shares of the Industrial Countries 1953-1971. The Manchester School, 327-344.
Ceylan, N. (2019). Revealed Comparative Advantage of Turkish and Hungarian Wheat Sectors. Scientific Journal Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 19(3), 16-22.
Cimpoieş, L., & Sârbu, O. (2020). The competitiveness of Moldova’s agri-food trade with E.U. after DCFTA implementations. The Research Institute for Agriculture Economy and Rural Development (ICEADR), (s. 32-38). Bucharest.
COMTRADE. (2023, 09 12). http://wits.worldbank.org/WITS/WITS/AdvanceQuery/RawTradeData/QueryDefinition.aspx?Page=RawTradeData adresinden alındı
Desai, F. P. (2012). Trends in fragmentation of production: A comparative study of Asia and Latin America. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 37, 217-229.
Jovovic, D., & Jovovic, D. (2018). Competitiveness of Food Manufacturing of Rebuplic of Serbia. Economics of Agriculture, 49-64.
Kösekahyaoğlu, L., & Sarıçoban, K. (2017). Ticaret Sonrası Verilerle Rekabet Gücünün Ölçülmesinde Kullanılan İndeksler Üzerine Bir Literatür Taraması. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 424-444.
Karaman, S., Özkan, B., & Yiğit, F. (2023). Export Competitiveness of Türkiye Agri-food Products in the European Union and The Shanghai Cooperation Markets. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(2), 665-676.
Laursen, K. (2015). Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialization. Eurasian Bus Rev, 5, 99-115.
Maqbool, M. S., Mahmood, T., Hussain, S., & Ashraf, M. (2020). Analysis of Trade Competitiveness of Pakistan Cereal Products in Global Perspective. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 6(1), 97-106.
Matkovski, B., Kalas, B., Zekic, S., & Jeremic, M. (2019). Agri-food competitiveness in South East Europe. Outlook on Agriculture, 48(4), 326-335.
MERCOSUR. (2023, 10 02). https://www.mercosur.int/en/# adresinden alındı
Michaely, M. (1962). Concentration in International Trade. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2023, 10 02). https://www.mfa.gov.tr/guney-ortak-pazari.tr.mfa adresinden alındı
Ministry of Trade. (2023, 10 02). https://ticaret.gov.tr/dis-iliskiler/serbest-ticaret-anlasmalari/muzakere-sureci-devam-eden-stalar adresinden alındı
Öztürk, Y. K. (2018). Dünya İktisat Tarihinde, Dünya Ticaret Örgütü’nün Yeri ve Önemi. Turkish Studies Economics, Finance and Politics, 13(22), 437-449.
Sujova, A., Hlavackova, P., & Marcinekova, K. (2015). Evaluating the Compettiveness of Wood Processing Industry. Original Scientific Paper, 281-288.
Sukmaya, S. G., Saptana, & Perwita, A. D. (2021). Agri-food commodity mapping and trade between Indonesia and Australia. E3S Web of Conferences (s. 1-8). IConARD .
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.