Impact of Boron Toxicity and Humic Substance Applications on Cotton Fiber Quality and Yield

Authors

Keywords:

Boron, humic substance, Cotton, Toxicity, Alleviation

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of boron toxicity and humic substance applications on cotton fiber quality and yield over two consecutive years, targeting boron toxicity issues in soils affected by agricultural and geothermal activities. The experiment evaluated varying concentrations of boron (0.6–1.8–5.4–16.2 mg B l-1) and humic substances (0–200–400 kg ha-1), with a focus on their effects on seed cotton yield, fiber length, fineness, strength, and gin efficiency. In the first year, the highest seed cotton yield was recorded at 452.5 kg da-1 with the B1 application, followed by 428.3 kg da-1 with B2. In the second year, increased boron application led to a notable decrease in seed cotton yield, with the lowest yield at 99.3 kg da-1 for the B4 application. The highest dose of boron also significantly reduced fiber strength, with the lowest recorded at 31.57 g/tex, and gin efficiency, which dropped to 37.98%. Humic substance applications showed limited influence on fiber quality parameters; however, the highest dose (H3) led to a significant increase in fiber strength to 33.47 g/tex in the second year. Cotton leaves accumulated substantial amounts of boron, reaching concentrations of 2048 mg B kg-1 during the flowering period of the second year, suggesting that cotton could serve as a hyperaccumulator in phytoremediation efforts for boron-contaminated soils. The study further determined that cotton can tolerate boron concentrations in irrigation water ranging from 1.8 to 5.4 mg B l-1, making it a viable crop in boron-affected regions. These findings provide critical insights into the potential of cotton as a resilient crop in environments with elevated boron levels, underscoring the need for further research to optimize cotton cultivation under such conditions.

References

Ahmed, N., Abid, M., & Ahmad, F. (2008). Boron toxicity in irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40, 2443. [DOI bulunamadı]

Ahmed, N., Abid, M., & Rashid, A. (2010). Zinc fertilization impact on irrigated cotton grown in an aridisol: Growth, productivity, fiber quality, and oil quality. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 41, 1627–1643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2010.485242

Akar, D. (2007). Potential boron pollution in surface water, crop, and soil in the Lower Buyuk Menderes Basin. Environmental Engineering Science, 24(9), 1273–1279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ees.2006.0218

Angin, I., Turan, M., Ketterings, Q. M., & Çakıcı, A. (2008). Humic acid addition enhances B and Pb phytoextraction by vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash). Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 188, 335–343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9548-0

Anonymous. (2010). Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological profile for boron. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Atlanta, GA. [DOI bulunamadı]

Aydın, M., Kaptan, M. A., & Dalkılıç, Z. (2010). Relationship between fruit cracking and nutritional status of fig (Ficus carica L. cv. Sarilop) plantations in the lowland of Aydın, Turkey. International Soil Fertility Congress, Germany. [DOI bulunamadı]

Bergmann, W. (1992). Nutritional disorders of plants. Gustav Fischer Verlag. [DOI bulunamadı]

Bradford, G. R. (1966). Boron. In H. D. Chapman (Ed.), Diagnostic criteria for plants and soils (pp. 33–61). University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences. [DOI bulunamadı]

Butterwick, R. F., Weekes, T. E. C., Rowlinson, P., Parker, D. S., & Armstrong, D. G. (1989). The effect of long-term daily administration of bovine somatotrophin on the performance of dairy cows over a second consecutive lactation. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972), 1989, 20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0308229600010217

Chapman, V. J., Edwards, D. G., Blamey, F. P. C., & Asher, C. J. (1997). Challenging the dogma of a narrow supply range between deficiency and toxicity of boron. In Boron in soils and plants: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Boron in Soils and Plants (pp. 151–155). Springer Netherlands. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5564-9_29

Chatzissavvidis, C., & Therios, I. (2010). Response of four olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars to six B concentrations: Growth performance, nutrient status, and gas exchange parameters. Scientia Horticulturae, 127, 29–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.008

Chatzissavvidis, C., Therios, I., Antonopoulou, C., & Dimassi, K. (2008). Effects of high boron concentration and scion-rootstock combination on growth and nutritional status of olive plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 31, 638–658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904160801926343

de Souza Júnior, J. P., de M Prado, R., Campos, C. N., Sousa Junior, G. S., Oliveira, K. R., Cazetta, J. O., & Gratão, P. L. (2022). Addition of silicon to boron foliar spray in cotton plants modulates the antioxidative system attenuating boron deficiency and toxicity. BMC Plant Biology, 22(1), 338. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03721-7

Eleyan, S.E.D., Abodahab, A.A., Abdallah, A.M. & Rabeh, H.A. (2014). Foliar application of boron and zinc effects on growth, yield and fiber properties of some Egyptian cotton cultivars (Gossypium barbadense L.). IJACS, 7(13): 1274- 1282. [DOI bulunamadı]

Evangelou, M. W. H., Daghan, H., & Schaeffer, A. (2004). The influence of humic acids on the phytoextraction of cadmium from soil. Chemosphere, 57, 207–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.06.017

Gemici, Ü., & Tarcan, G. (2002). Hydrogeochemistry of the Simav geothermal field, Western Anatolia, Turkey. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 116, 215–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0273(02)00217-2

Grimes, D. W., & El-Zik, K. M. (1990). Cotton. In Irrigation of agricultural crops. American Society of Agronomy. [DOI bulunamadı]

Kacar, B., & İnal, A. (2008). Bitki analizleri. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. [DOI bulunamadı]

Karademir, E., & Karademir, Ç., (2019). Effect of different boron application on cotton yield components and fiber quality properties. Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova, 4 (180), 341-352. [DOI: 10.2478/cerce-2019-0033]

Karakaya, Z., & Paksoy, M. (2008). Yaz sezonunda yetiştirilen brokkolide (Brassica oleracea L.) bazı organik maddelerin bitki gelişimi, verim ve kaliteye etkileri. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 1–6. [DOI bulunamadı]

Keren, R., & Bingham, F. T. (1985). Boron in water, soils, and plants. Advances in Soil Science, 1, 230–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5046-3_7

Koç, C. (2011). Effects of boron pollution in the lower Buyuk Menderes Basin on agricultural areas and crops. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 30, 347–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ep.10485

Kumar, S., Kumar, D., Sekhon, K.S. & Choudhary, O.P. (2018). Influence of levels and methods of boron application on the yield and uptake of boron by cotton in a calcareous soil of Punjab. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 49 (4): 499-514, DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2018.1431268

Mumma, R. O., Raupach, D. C., Waldman, J. P., Tong, S. S. C., Jacobs, M. L., Babish, J. G., Hotchkiss, J. H., Wszolek, P. C., Gutenmann, W. H., Bache, C. A., & Lisk, D. J. (1984). National survey of elements and other constituents in municipal sewage sludges. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 13, 75–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01055648

Nable, R. O., Banuelos, G. S., & Paull, J. G. (1997). Boron toxicity. Plant and Soil, 193, 181–198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5580-9_12

Oertli, J. J., & Roth, J. A. (1969). Boron nutrition of sugar beet, cotton, and soybean. Agronomy Journal, 61, 191–195. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1969.00021962006100020006x

Oosterhuis, D. M., Chipamaunga, J., & Bate, G. C. (1983). Nitrogen uptake of field grown cotton. I. Distribution in plant components in relation to fertilization and yield. Experimental Agriculture, 19, 91–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700010553

Ören, Y. (2007). Farklı zamanlarda uygulanan hümik asit ve çinko (Zn) uygulamasının pamukta (Gossypium hirsutum L.) verim, verim komponentleri ve lif kalite özellikleri üzerine olan etkisinin saptanması. ADÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Aydın. [DOI bulunamadı]

Ören, Y., & Başal, H. (2006). Humik asit ve çinko (Zn) uygulamalarının pamukta (Gossypium hirsutum L.) verim, verim komponentleri ve lif kalite özelliklerine etkisi. ADÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 3, 77–83. [DOI bulunamadı]

Reid, R. (2010). Can we really increase yields by making crop plants tolerant to boron toxicity? Plant Science, 178, 9–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.10.006

Rosolem, C. A., & Bogiani, J. C. (2011). Stress physiology in cotton. In Physiology of boron stress in cotton. Tennessee, ABD. [DOI bulunamadı]

Ryan, J., Estefan, G., & Rashid, A. (2001). Soil and plant analysis laboratory manual. ICARDA. [DOI bulunamadı]

Salinity Laboratory Staff. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Handbook. [DOI bulunamadı]

Stevenson, F. J. (1994). Humus chemistry, genesis, composition, reactions. Wiley. [DOI bulunamadı]

Turan, M., & Angin, I. (2004). Organic chelate assisted phytoextraction of B, Cd, Mo and Pb from contaminated soils using two agricultural crop species. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B: Soil and Plant Science, 54, 221–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09064710410035622

Wolf, B. (1974). Improvement in the Azomethine-H method for the determination of boron. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 5, 39–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103627409366478

Downloads

Published

24.12.2024

How to Cite

Kaptan, M. A., & Aydın, M. (2024). Impact of Boron Toxicity and Humic Substance Applications on Cotton Fiber Quality and Yield. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology, 12(12), 2606–2614. Retrieved from https://agrifoodscience.com/index.php/TURJAF/article/view/7099

Issue

Section

Research Paper