Screening of Promising Maize Varieties Against Maize Weevil (Sitophilus zeamais Motschulky) Under Storage Condition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i12.2258-2263.6124Anahtar Kelimeler:
Maize weevil, Screening, Storage pest, VarietiesÖzet
The maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky) causes significant quantitative and qualitative losses during storage. To identify resistant varieties of maize against this pest, an experiment was conducted in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with 11 varieties in free and no-choice conditions. The study measured weight loss, mean bored grain, debris, and weevil numbers at 30, 60, and 90 days. The findings showed that BG13Y-POP, Manakamana-7, and RML-19/RML-6 were the most resistant varieties, with weight loss percentages of 1.99%, 1.47%, and 1.74%, respectively, and final weevil numbers of 104, 72, and 73. Ganesh-2 and ZM-401 were the most susceptible varieties, with weight losses of 7.34% and 6.05%, respectively. The maximum debris weight was found in RML-761/RL-105 (1.98 g), while the minimum was found in Manakamana-7 (0.26 g). The highest number of bored grains was observed in Ganesh-2 (81), while the lowest number was observed in Rampur-4 (51). Similarly, ZM-401 (158) and Ganesh-2 (165) exhibited the highest weevil population, while the lowest count was found in Rampur-4 (72). Overall, using resistant varieties, such as Manakamana-7, BG13Y-POP, and RML-19/RML-6, can be an effective approach for reducing post-harvest losses from weevil infestation.
Referanslar
Abebe F, Tefera T, Mugo S, Beyene Y Vidal, S. 2009. Resistance of maize varieties to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). African Journal of Biotechnology, 8(21).
Arnason JT, Lambert JDH, Gale J, Mihm J, Bjarnason M, Jewell D, Pietrzak L. 2004. Is “quality protein” maize more susceptible than normal cultivars to attack by the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais? Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2(4), 349–358.
Bamaiyi LJ, Uvah II, Dike MC, Onu I. 1999. Relative resistance of some sorghum varieties to the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (Linneaus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 13(2), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v13n02_03
Bergvinson D, García-Lara S. 2004. Genetic approaches to reducing losses of stored grain to insects and diseases. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 7(4), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2004.05.001
Bhandari G, Achhami BB, Karki TB, Bhandari B, Bhandari G. 2015. Survey on maize post-harvest losses and its management practices in the western hills of Nepal. Journal of Maize Research and Development, 1(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.3126/jmrd.v1i1.14247
Dari S, Pixley KV, Setimela P. 2010. Resistance of early generation maize inbred lines and their hybrids to maize weevil [Sitophilus zeamais (Motschulsky)]. Crop Science, 50(4), 1310–1317. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0621
Derera J, Pixley KV, Giga DP. 2010. Appraisal of protocol for the rapid screening of maize genotypes for maize weevil resistance. African Entomology, 18(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.4001/003.018.0102
FAO. 2021. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. Available from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#compare [Accessed 10 April 2023]
Gairhe S, Timsina KP, Ghimire YN, Lamichhane J, Subedi S, Shrestha J. 2021. Production and distribution system of maize seed in Nepal. Heliyon, 7(4), e06775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06775
García‐Lara S, Bergvinson DJ, Burt AJ, Ramputh AI, Díaz‐Pontones DM, Arnason JT. 2004. The role of pericarp cell wall components in maize weevil resistance. Crop Science, 44(5), 1546–1552. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1546
Gewinner J, Harnisch R, Mück O. 1996. Manual of the prevention of postharvest grain losses. Manual of the prevention of post-harvest grain losses.
Keba T, Sori W. 2012. Differential resistance of maize varieties to maize weevil (Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky)(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) under laboratory conditions. Journal of Entomology, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3923/je.2013.1.12
Khakata S, Nzuve FM, Cheminingwa GN, Mwimali M, Karanja J, Harvey J, Mwololo JK. 2018. Postharvest evaluation of selected hybrids to maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais resistance. Journal of Stored Products and Postharvest Research, 9(3), 16–26.
MOALD. Statistical Information on Nepalese agriculture. 2020/21. Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock Development, Planning and Development Cooperation Coordination Division, Government of Nepal. Singhadurbar. Available from: https://moald.gov.np/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/STATISTICAL-INFORMATION-ON-NEPALESE-AGRICULTURE-2077-78.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2023]
Muzemu S, Chitamba J, Goto, S. 2013. Screening of stored maize (Zea mays L.) varieties grain for tolerance against maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.). International Journal of Plant Research, 3(3), 17–22.
Nukenine, EN.2010. Stored product protection in Africa: Past, present and future. Julius-Kühn-Archiv, 425, 26.
Ojo JA, Omoloye AA. 2016. Development and life history of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) on cereal crops. Advances in Agriculture, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7836379
Ribeiro BM, Guedes RNC, Oliveira EE, Santos JP. 2003. Insecticide resistance and synergism in Brazilian populations of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 39(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-474X(02)00014-0
Suleiman RA, Aaron N, Dennis W, Carl BJ, Kurt RA. 2014. Is flint corn naturally Resistant to maize weevil infestation? In Quebec Canada July 13–. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
