A Graphical Approach as Multiple Comparison Method for the Balanced and Partially Balanced Lattice Designs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13i3.697-706.7253Anahtar Kelimeler:
ANOM- Tukey- Duncan- LSD- Multiple comparisons- simulationÖzet
This study proposes a reliable and easy understandable statistical solution for the selection of varieties in the balanced and partially balanced lattice experiments, which are widely used in plant breeding studies. For this purpose, the Analysis of Means (ANOM) was adapted to the balanced, simple and triple lattice designs and an R function is developed for it. The adapted ANOM approach was compared with the Tukey, Duncan and Fisher’s LSD tests with respect to the actual type I error rate in all of the balanced, simple and triple lattice designs. In addition to this, the ANOM approach and Tukey test were examined comparatively using a hypothetical example. According to the simulation results, LSD and Duncan could not maintain the actual type I error rate at 5.00% under any conditions. This situation became more dramatic with the increase in the number of groups. While the actual type I error rate for LSD and Duncan tests varied between 54.36%-100.00% and 37.49%-99.96%, respectively, for ANOM and Tukey tests it varied between 4.64%-6.08% and 4.62%-6.45%, respectively. ANOM and Tukey tests were quite successful in terms of maintaining the actual type I error rate. However, since the number of groups in lattice designs was quite high, the given hypothetical example showed that it would be more understandable to use the ANOM method.
Referanslar
Bradley, J. V. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 31, 144–152.
Cochran,W., & Cox, G. (1960). Experimental Designs. JohnWiley & Sons.
Comstock, R. E., Peterson, W. J., & Stewart, H. (1948). An application of the balanced lattice design in a feeding trial with swine. Journal of Animal Science. 7, 320–331.
de Mendiburu, F. (2021). agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R package version 1.3-5.
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Multiple range and multiple f tests. Biometrics. 11, 1–42.
Dunnett, C. W. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 50, 1096–1121.
Fisher, R. A. (1937). The design of experiments. No. 2nd Ed. Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh & London.
Genz, A., Bretz, F., Miwa, T., Mi, X., Leisch, F., Scheipl, F., & Hothorn, T. (2021). mvtnorm: MultivariateNormal and t Distributions. R package version 1.1-2.
Genç, S., & Soysal, M. İ. (2018). Parametrik ve parametrik olmayan çoklu karşilaştirma testleri. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 1(1), 18-27.
Glass, G. V., & Hakstian, A. R. (1969). Measures of association in comparative experiments: Their development and interpretation. American Educational Research Journal. 6, 403–414.
Hayter, A. J. (1986). The maximum familywise error rate of fisher’s least significant difference test. Journal of The American Statistical Association. 81, 1000–1004.
Hsu, J. (1996). Multiple Comparisons: Theory and Methods. CRC Press.
Nelson, P. R. (1983). The analysis of means for balanced experimental designs. Journal of Quality Technology. 15, 45–54.
Nelson, P. R. (1985). Power curves for the analysis of means. Technometrics. 27, 65–73.
Nelson, P. R. (1989). Multiple comparisons of means using simultaneous confidence intervals. Journal of Quality Technology. 21, 232–241.
Nelson, P. R. (1993). Additional uses for the analysis of means and extended tables of critical values. Technometrics. 35, 61–71.
Nelson, P. R., & Dudewicz, E. J. (2002). Exact analysis of means with unequal variances. Technometrics. 44, 152–160.
Nelson, P. R., Wludyka, P. S., & Copeland, K. A. (2005). The analysis of means: a graphical method for comparing means, rates, and proportions. SIAM.
Ott, E. R. (1983). Analysis of means—a graphical procedure. Journal of Quality Technology. 15, 10–18.
Pran Kumar, M., & Rao, C. (1998). Anom-type graphical method for testing the equality of several variances. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. 27, 459–468.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
Rao, C. V. (2005). Analysis of means—a review. Journal of Quality Technology. 37, 308–315.
Tukey, J.W. (1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics. 99–114.
Tukey, J.W. (1991). The philosophy of multiple comparisons. Statistical Science. 100–116.
Venables,W. N., & Ripley, B.D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S. NewYork: Springer, fourth edn. ISBN 0-387-95457-0.
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.
Wludyka, P. S., & Nelson, P. R. (1997). An analysis-of-means-type test for variances from normal populations. Technometrics. 39, 274–285.
Wu, S.F., & Liao, B.X. (2004). A simulation study of multiple comparisons with the average under heteroscedasticity. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. 33, 639–659.
Yates, F. (1936a). Incomplete randomized blocks. Annals of Eugenics. 7, 121–140.
Yates, F. (1936b). A new method of arranging variety trials involving a large number of varieties. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 26, 424–455.
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
