The Effect of Different Sulphur Sources Applied at Various Rates on Soil pH

Yazarlar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13i1.59-64.7256

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Sulfur application- soil amendment- agricultural sustainability- Texture - Soil pH

Özet

Soil pH, governed by the relative concentrations of hydrogen () and hydroxyl () ions, is a key factor affecting the chemical, physical, and biological properties of soils. Most soils in Türkiye are alkaline due to calcareous parent material and climatic influences, which restricts the availability of essential nutrients to plants. Sulphur applications are widely employed to reduce soil pH and increase nutrient bioavailability. The use of Sulphur for the amelioration of alkaline soils will continue to be a crucial strategy for enhancing agricultural sustainability in the future. This study investigates the effects of different Sulphur sources on the pH of sandy and clay-loam texture soils. This study investigates the effects of different Sulphur sources on the pH of sandy and clay loam textured soils. The soil samples used in the research were taken from Pınarbaşı and Melikgazi districts of Kayseri province, and soil samples were taken from both regions from a depth of 30 cm and from 20 randomly determined different points. Sulphur applications were applied at rates of (0, 0.02, 0.04 g 100 g-1) (X: powdered Sulphur ) and (0, 0.044, 0.088 g 100 g-1) (Y: granular Sulphur ) based on weight for clay-loam and sandy textured soils, respectively. Samples taken on days 0, 15, 30, 60, 90, 180, and 360 post-applications showed that the impact of Sulphur applications on soil pH change was significant across all treatments (p<0.01). The lowest pH measurement, 6.92, was observed in sandy textured soils with an application from granular Sulphur at 0.088 g 100 g-1. The pH change in clay-loam textured soils was found to range from 8.13 to 7.79, and in sandy textured soils from 7.69 to 6.92. These changes suggest that the acidifying effect of Sulphur oxidation on soil pH varies depending on the soil’s buffering capacity, particle size ratio, application rate, and incubation day. Consequently, the granular Sulphur was found to be more effective compared to the control and powdered Sulphur , and an application rate of 0.088 g 100 g-1 might be effective for both clay-loam and sandy soils. However, due to its lack of economic feasibility, 0.044 g dose or the doses from powdered Sulphur might be more appropriate.

Referanslar

Abou Hussien E., Nada W., & Elgezery M. (2020). Influence of Sulphur compost application on some chemical properties of calcareous soil and consequent responses of Hordeum vulgare L. plants. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science, 60(1): 67-82.

Akay A. (2022). The effect of different Sulphur forms and biochar applications on the development of the radish plant (Raphanus sativus) in calcareous soils. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty, 19(3): 644-655.

Awadalla, A. A., Ewees, M. S., & Moussa, S. A. (2007). Response of a newly reclaimed calcareous soil at the eastern rim of el fayoum depression to agrochemical amendment for sustaining its agricultural utilization. Fayoum journal of agricultural research and development, 21(1), 63-77.

Bouyoucos GJ. (1951). A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils. Agron J, 43: 434-438.

Fahad S., Sonmez O., Saud S., Wang D., Wu C., Adnan M., & Turan V. (2021). Developing climate-resilient crops: Improving global food security and safety. CRC Press, London, UK, pp: 243.

Fuentes-Lara, L. O., Medrano-Macías, J., Pérez-Labrada, F., Rivas-Martínez, E. N., García-Enciso, E. L., González-Morales, S., ... & Benavides-Mendoza, A. (2019). From elemental Sulphur to hydrogen sulfide in agricultural soils and plants. Molecules, 24(12), 2282.

Güneş A., & Sönmez O. (2018). The effect of different doses of Sulphur on soil pH. International Eurasian Congress on Natural Nutrition and Healthy Life, 2018: 105-108.

Kapur S., Akça E., & Günal H. (2017). The Soils of Türkiye. Springer, London, UK, pp: 45-57.

Karaman, M. R., Brohi, A. R., Müftüoğlu, N. M., Öztaş, T., & Zengin, M. (2012). Sürdürülebilir toprak verimliliği kitabı. Güncellenmiş, 3, 42-43.

Lindsay, W. L., & Norvell, W. (1978). Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil science society of America journal, 42(3), 421-428.

Lisowska A., Filipek-Mazur B., Sołtys J., Niemiec M., Gorczyca O., Bar-Michalczyk D., & Kuboń M. (2022). Preparation, characterization of granulated Sulphur fertilizers and their effects on sandy soils. Materials, 15(2): 612.

Olsen, S. R., & Sommers, E. L. (1982). Phosphorus soluble in sodium bicarbonate. Methods of soil analysis, part, 2, 404-430.

Orman S., & Kaplan M. (2000). Effects of two different Sulphur sources on pH of calcareous soils. Mediterr Agric Sci, 2000: 171-179.

Orman S. (2012). Effects of elemental Sulphur and farmyard manure applications to calcareous saline clay loam soil on growth and some nutrient concentrations of tomato plants. Journal of Food, Agric Environ, 10(2): 720-725.

Paton, T. R. (2023). Soils: a new global view. CRC Press.

Rath, K. M., Fierer, N., Murphy, D. V., & Rousk, J. (2019). Linking bacterial community composition to soil salinity along environmental gradients. The ISME journal, 13(3), 836-846.

Richards, L. A. (Ed.). (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils (No. 60). US Government Printing Office.

Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods. 6th EdIowa State Univ Press. Ame. Iowa. USA, 2, 304-8.

Sönmez B., Özbahçe A., Akgül S., & Keçeci M. (2018). Development of a Geographic Database of the Fertility and Organic Carbon Content of Turkish Soils. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Agricultural Research and Policies Project Final Report TAGEM, Ankara, Türkiye, pp: 123.

Tabak M., Lisowska A., & Filipek-Mazur B. (2020). Bioavailability of Sulphur from waste obtained during biogas deSulphur ization and the effect of Sulphur on soil acidity and biological activity. Processes, 8(7): 863.

Tietel Z., Yermiyah, U., & Bar-Tal A. (2022). Sulfate fertilization preserves tomato fruit nutritional quality. Agronomy, 12(5): 1117.

Uçgun K., Kelebek C., Cansu M., Altındal M., & Yalçın B. (2019). The use of certain materials affecting soil pH in cereal agriculture. Soil and Water J, 2019: 94-100.

USSL Staff. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. USDA Handbook No 60, Agriculture Handbook, 60, 83-100. Washington DC, USA, pp: 45.

Walkley, A., & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil science, 37(1), 29-38.

Yaraş K., & Daşgan Y. (2012). The effect of micronized-bentonite-Sulphur and organic matter applied to soil on soil pH, plant growth, yield, and fruit quality of tomatoes in greenhouse conditions. J Agric Sci Res, 2012(1): 175-180.

Zeng Q., An S., Liu Y., Wang H., & Wang Y. (2019). Biogeography and the driving factors affecting forest soil bacteria in an arid area. Sci Total Environ, 680: 124-131.

Zhao, F. J., Hawkesford, M. J. and McGrath, S. P. (1999). Sulphur assimilation and effects on yield and quality of wheat. J. Cereal Sci. 30:1-17.

Zhao, C., Degryse, F., Gupta, V., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2015). Elemental Sulphur oxidation in Australian cropping soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 79(1), 89-96.

Yayınlanmış

2025-01-18

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Kılıç, F. N., & Sönmez, O. (2025). The Effect of Different Sulphur Sources Applied at Various Rates on Soil pH. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 13(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13i1.59-64.7256

Sayı

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi