Detection of Structural Damage After an Earthquake Using GIS and Remote Sensing Methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v13i3.688-696.7474Anahtar Kelimeler:
GIS- Remote sensing- Deep learning- Mask R-CNN- Satellite Images- MalatyaÖzet
Developments in Geographic Information Systems and Remote Sensing (RS) technologies and innovative approaches emerging in deep learning (DL) supported analysis methods have an important place in disaster research as in every field. Convolutional neural networks such as Mask RCNN, U-NET, one of the deep learning methods for disaster damage impact assessment and classification, have started to show successful results. However, high-resolution geospatial imagery and drones provide faster and more accurate detection of structural damage. In this study, damaged building detection was performed using Göktürk-1 satellite images from 6 February 2023 using Mask-RCNN architecture. In this study, deep learning methods were used to detect the collapsed buildings in the city of Malatya during the 6 February 2023 earthquakes. The study aims to emphasize the significance of GIS and remote sensing for the timely and efficient evaluation of building damage after a disaster. Considering this, high quality images of Malatya city before and after the earthquake were analyzed and data sets were created by masking using Mask RCNN deep learning method through ArcGIS Pro 3.4.0 software. According to the results of the research, it quickly detected damaged buildings with an accuracy rate of 70% according to satellite images after the earthquake. As a result, GIS and deep learning models were used to detect and map the initial damage after the earthquake.
Referanslar
Al Deen Taher, S. S., & Dang, J. (2023). Autonomous Multiple Damage Detection and Segmentation in Structures Using Mask R-CNN. In (pp. 545-556). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93236-7_45
Arikan İspi̇r, D., & Yildiz, F. (2025). Using deep learning algorithms for built-up area extraction from high-resolution GÖKTÜRK-1 satellite imagery. Earth Science Informatics, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01518-w
Arnold, C. R. (2023). Locating Low Head Dams Using a Deep Learning Model in ArcGIS Pro With Aerial Imagery (Master’s thesis, Utah State University). https://doi.org/10.26076/3438-170a
ATCouncil. (2005). ATC-20-1 field manual: postearthquake safety evaluation of buildings. Redwood City (California): ATC.
Ati̇k, Ş. Ö. (2023). Object-Based Integration Using Deep Learning and Multi-Resolution Segmentation in Building Extraction from Very High Resolution Satellite Imagery. Turkish Journal of Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.51489/tuzal.1337656
Balz, T., & Liao, M. (2010). Building-damage detection using post-seismic high-resolution SAR satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(13), 3369-3391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003727671
Braik, A. M., & Koliou, M. (2024). Automated building damage assessment and large‐scale mapping by integrating satellite imagery, GIS, and deep learning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 39(15), 2389-2404. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.13197
Brunner, D., Lemoine, G., & Bruzzone, L. (2010). Earthquake Damage Assessment of Buildings Using VHR Optical and SAR Imagery. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 48(5), 2403-2420. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2009.2038274
Büyüközkan, G., Ilıcak, Ö., & Feyzioğlu, O. (2022). A review of urban resilience literature. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77, 103579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103579
Dell’Acqua, F., & Gamba, P. (2012). Remote Sensing and Earthquake Damage Assessment: Experiences, Limits, and Perspectives. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(10), 2876-2890. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2012.2196404
Dong, L., & Shan, J. (2013). A comprehensive review of earthquake-induced building damage detection with remote sensing techniques. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 84, 85-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.06.011
Du, Y.-N., Feng, D.-C., & Wu, G. (2024). InSAR-based rapid damage assessment of urban building portfolios following the 2023 Turkey earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 103, 104317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104317
Eguchi, R. T., Huyck, C. K., Ghosh, S., Adams, B. J., & McMillan, A. (2009). Utilizing New Technologies in Managing Hazards and Disasters. In (pp. 295-323). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2238-7_15
Esri (2024a). How Mask R-CNN Works. https://developers.arcgis.com/python/latest/guide/how-maskrcnn-works/).
Esri (2024b). Get ready for deep learning in ArcGIS Pro. https://learn.arcgis.com/en/projects/get-ready-for-deep-learning-in-arcgis-pro/.
Filipi Gonçalves dos Santos, C., & Papa, J. P. (2022). Avoiding Overfitting: A Survey on Regularization Methods for Convolutional Neural Networks. arXiv e-prints, arXiv: 2201.03299. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.03299
Kaplan, O., & Kaplan, G. (2021). Response Spectra-Based Post-Earthquake Rapid Structural Damage Estimation Approach Aided with Remote Sensing Data: 2020 Samos Earthquake. Buildings, 12(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12010014
Kirici, S., & Soyluk, A. (2023). 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: Evaluation of the Site Analysis of the Types of Building Damage and Types of Building Demolition. Mimarlık Bilimleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi (MBUD), 327-352. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1318488
Korkmaz, K. A. (2009). Earthquake disaster risk assessment and evaluation for Turkey. Environmental Geology, 57(2), 307-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-008-1439-1
Lozano, J. M., Nichols, E., Frost, J. D., & Tien, I. (2023). Spatial and temporal evolution of post-disaster data for damage assessment of civil infrastructure systems. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2023.2250531
Mahabir, R., Croitoru, A., Crooks, A., Agouris, P., & Stefanidis, A. (2018). A Critical Review of High and Very High-Resolution Remote Sensing Approaches for Detecting and Mapping Slums: Trends, Challenges and Emerging Opportunities. Urban Science, 2(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci2010008
Maraş, E. E., & Sarıyıldız, H. İ. (2023). İHA ile derin öğrenme algoritmaları kullanılarak hasarlı yapıların tespit edilmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(2), 427-437. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.35414/akufemubid.1171393
Matsuoka, M., & Yamazaki, F. (2005). Building Damage Mapping of the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake Using Envisat/ASAR Intensity Imagery. Earthquake Spectra, 21(1_suppl), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2101027
Moradi, M., & Shah-Hosseini, R. (2020). Earthquake Damage Assessment Based on Deep Learning Method Using VHR Images. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECG2020-08545
Nex, F., Duarte, D., Tonolo, F. G., & Kerle, N. (2019). Structural Building Damage Detection with Deep Learning: Assessment of a State-of-the-Art CNN in Operational Conditions. Remote Sensing, 11(23), 2765. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11232765
Özerol Özman, G., Arslan Selçuk, S., & Arslan, A. (2024). Image classification on Post-Earthquake damage assessment: A case of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquake. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 56, 101780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101780
Pan, Z., Xu, J., Guo, Y., Hu, Y., & Wang, G. (2020). Deep Learning Segmentation and Classification for Urban Village Using a Worldview Satellite Image Based on U-Net. Remote Sensing, 12(10), 1574. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101574
Sönmez, M. (2014). Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri (CBS) tabanlı deprem hasar riski analizi: Zeytinburnu (İstanbul) örneği. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi(56), 11-22. https://doi.org/10.17211/tcd.64562
Şıkoğlu, E. (2024). Deprem Sonrası Malatya’nın Merkezi İş Alanı (MİA) Cadde ve Sokak Sistemlerinin Yeniden Tasarlanmasına Ampirik Yaklaşım. İDEALKENT, 16(45), 1466-1492. https://doi.org/10.31198/idealkent.1468575
Vitale, R., & Milillo, P. (2024). Simulating SAR constellations systems for rapid damage mapping in urban areas: Case study of the 2023 Turkey-Syria earthquake. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 134, 104226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.104226
Wang, X., Feng, G., He, L., An, Q., Xiong, Z., Lu, H., Wang, W., Li, N., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023). Evaluating Urban Building Damage of 2023 Kahramanmaras, Turkey Earthquake Sequence Using SAR Change Detection. Sensors (Basel), 23(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/s23146342
Wu, L., Jiao, Z., & Zhang, Z. (2024, 2024). Building Damage Caused by Earthquake in Turkey.
Yamazaki, F., & Matsuoka, M. (2007). Remote Sensing Technologies in Post-Disaster Damage Assessment. Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 01(03), 193-210. https://doi.org/10.1142/s1793431107000122
Yu, X., Hu, X., Song, Y., Xu, S., Li, X., Song, X., Fan, X., & Wang, F. (2024). Intelligent assessment of building damage of 2023 Turkey-Syria Earthquake by multiple remote sensing approaches. npj Natural Hazards, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-024-00003-0
Zhan, Y., Liu, W., & Maruyama, Y. (2022). Damaged Building Extraction Using Modified Mask R-CNN Model Using Post-Event Aerial Images of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake. Remote Sensing, 14(4), 1002. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14041002
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
