EIN3/EIL (Ethylene Insensitive3 / Ethylene Insensitive3 Like) Protein Family in Phaseolus vulgaris: Identification, Evolution and Expression Analysis within the Genome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v11i2.215-226.5172Anahtar Kelimeler:
EIL gene family- transcription factor- bioinformatics- RNAseq.- Phaseolus vulgarisÖzet
Ethylene insensitive-3 (EIN3) / Ethylene insensitive-3-like (EIL) protein family is a small family of transcription factors specific to plants that play role in plant growth and development under various environmental conditions. In this study, various bioinformatics approaches were used to make an in-depth identification of the EIN3/EIL family at both the gene and protein levels. So, 11 Pvul-EIL genes were identified and their approximate locations were determined. Various biochemical and physicochemical properties of EIL proteins in Phaseolus vulgaris have been described. It was determined that Pvul-EIL proteins had a length of 447-651 amino acids and a molecular weight of 51.08-70.68 kDa. All duplications occurring in the Pvul-EIL genome were segmental type. It was observed that conserved motif, gene structure and phylogeny analyses all yielded similar results. For instance, it has been understood that genes with same motif type and number have similar gene structures and were located under the same branch in the phylogenetic tree. Pvul-EIL protein homology modeling showed that DNA binding properties and protein structure were similar to Arabidopsis EIN3. According to cis-element analysis, Pvul-EIL genes are engaged in a wide range of functions, including tissue-specific, stress, and hormone-sensitive expression. Additionally, RNAseq data was used to perform a comparative expression analysis of EIL genes. Various Pvul-EIL gene expression levels were detected under salt and drought stress. This is the first study to check the gene expression levels in P. vulgaris using in-silico detection and characterization of EIL genes. Therefore, obtained results can form the basis for future studies.
Referanslar
Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit Jr ME. 2012. Ethylene in plant biology. Academic press.
Ai B, Chen Y, Zhao M, Ding G, Xie J, Zhang F. 2021. Overexpression of miR1861h increases tolerance to salt stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 68: 87-92
An F, Zhang X, Zhu Z, Ji Y, He W, et al. 2012. Coordinated regulation of apical hook development by gibberellins and ethylene in etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings. Cell research 22: 915-27
An F, Zhao Q, Ji Y, Li W, Jiang Z, et al. 2010. Ethylene-induced stabilization of ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3 and EIN3-LIKE1 is mediated by proteasomal degradation of EIN3 binding F-box 1 and 2 that requires EIN2 in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 22: 2384-401. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.076588.
An J-P, Wang X-F, Li Y-Y, Song L-Q, Zhao L-L, et al. 2018. EIN3-LIKE1, MYB1, and ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR3 act in a regulatory loop that synergistically modulates ethylene biosynthesis and anthocyanin accumulation. Plant Physiology 178: 808-23. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00068
Ashraf M. 1999. Interactive effect of salt (NaCl) and nitrogen form on growth, water relations and photosynthetic capacity of sunflower (Helianthus annum L.). Annals of Applied Biology 135: 509-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1999.tb00881.x
Bailey-Serres J, Fukao T, Ronald P, Ismail A, Heuer S, Mackill D. 2010. Submergence tolerant rice: SUB1’s journey from landrace to modern cultivar. Rice 3: 138-47. doi:10.1007/s12284-010-9048-5
Bailey TL, Williams N, Misleh C, Li WW. 2006. MEME: discovering and analyzing DNA and protein sequence motifs. Nucleic acids research 34: W369-W73. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl198
Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic acids research 28: 235-42. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235
Bie B, Pan J, He H, Yang X, Zhao J, Cai R. 2013. Molecular cloning and expression analysis of the ethylene insensitive3 (EIN3) gene in cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Genet Mol Res 12: 4179-91. doi: 10.4238/2013.October.7.4
Bitocchi E, Nanni L, Bellucci E, Rossi M, Giardini A, et al. 2012. Mesoamerican origin of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is revealed by sequence data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: E788-E96. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108973109
Bleecker AB, Estelle MA, Somerville C, Kende H. 1988. Insensitivity to ethylene conferred by a dominant mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 241: 1086-89. doi: 10.1126/science.241.4869.1086.
Büyük İ, İlhan E, Şener D, Özsoy AU, Aras S. 2019. Genome-wide identification of CAMTA gene family members in Phaseolus vulgaris L. and their expression profiling during salt stress. Molecular biology reports 46: 2721-32. doi: 10.1007/s11033-019-04716-8
Büyük İ, Inal B, Ilhan E, Tanriseven M, Aras S, Erayman M. 2016. Genome-wide identification of salinity responsive HSP70 s in common bean. Molecular biology reports 43: 1251-66. doi: 10.1007/s11033-016-4057-0
Büyük İ, Okay A, Aksoy T, Aras S. 2021a. THE NIN-LIKE Protein (NLP) Family in Common Bean: Genome-Wide Identification, Evolution and Expression Analysis. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology 30: 58-84
Büyük İ, Okay A, Aras S. 2021b. Identification and Characterization of SRS Genes in Phaseolus vulgaris Genome and Their Responses Under Salt Stress. Biochemical Genetics: 1-22. doi: 10.1007/s10528-021-10108-0
Büyük İ, Okay A, Gorska M, İlhan E, ARAS ES. 2021c. Identification and characterization of the Pvul-GASA gene family in the Phaseolus vulgaris and expression patterns under salt stress. Turkish Journal of Botany: 45. doi:10.3906/bot-2101-13
Campeanu M, Campeanu C, Capraru G, Soiman O. 2005. Karyotype analysis in Phaseolus vulgaris L. Cultivars. Journal of Experimental and Molecular Biology 6
Cao Y, Han Y, Meng D, Li D, Jin Q, et al. 2017. Genome-wide analysis suggests high level of microsynteny and purifying selection affect the evolution of EIN3/EIL family in Rosaceae. PeerJ 5: e3400. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3400.
Chaerle L, Hagenbeek D, Vanrobaeys X, Van Der Straeten D. 2007. Early detection of nutrient and biotic stress in Phaseolus vulgaris. International Journal of Remote Sensing 28: 3479-92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160601024259
Chang C. 2016. QandA: How do plants respond to ethylene and what is its importance? BMC biology 14: 1-7. 10.1186/s12915-016-0230-0
Chao Q, Rothenberg M, Solano R, Roman G, Terzaghi W, Ecker JR. 1997. Activation of the ethylene gas response pathway in Arabidopsis by the nuclear protein ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 and related proteins. Cell 89: 1133-44. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80300-1.
Chen G, Alexander L, Grierson D. 2004. Constitutive expression of EIL-like transcription factor partially restores ripening in the ethylene-insensitive Nr tomato mutant. Journal of experimental botany 55: 1491-97. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh168.
Chen H, Xue L, Chintamanani S, Germain H, Lin H, et al. 2009. Ethylene Insensitive3 and Ethylene Insensitive3-Like1 Repress Salicylic Acid Induction Deficient2 expression to negatively regulate plant innate immunity in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 21: 2527-40. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.065193
Chung M-Y, Nath UK, Vrebalov J, Gapper N, Lee JM, et al. 2020. Ectopic expression of miRNA172 in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) reveals novel function in fruit development through regulation of an AP2 transcription factor. BMC plant biology 20: 1-15. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02489-y.
Filiz E, Vatansever R, Ozyigit II, Uras ME, Sen U, et al. 2017. Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of EIL gene family in woody plant representative poplar (Populus trichocarpa). Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 627: 30-45. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2017.06.012
Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, et al. 2012. Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic acids research 40: D1178-D86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr944
Guo AY, Zhu QH, Chen X, Luo JC. 2007. GSDS: a gene structure display server. Yi chuan= Hereditas 29: 1023-26
Guo H, Ecker JR. 2004. The ethylene signaling pathway: new insights. Current opinion in plant biology 7: 40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2003.11.011.
Guzman P, Ecker JR. 1990. Exploiting the triple response of Arabidopsis to identify ethylene-related mutants. The Plant Cell 2: 513-23. 10.1105/tpc.2.6.513
Hiraga S, Sasaki K, Hibi T, Yoshida H, Uchida E, et al. 2009. Involvement of two rice Ethylene Insensitive3-Like genes in wound signaling. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 282: 517-29. doi: 10.1007/s00438-009-0483-1.
Hiz MC, Canher B, Niron H, Turet M. 2014. Transcriptome analysis of salt tolerant common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under saline conditions. PloS one 9: e92598. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092598
Horton P, Park KJ, Obayashi T, Nakai K. 2006. Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific bioinformatics conference: 39-48. World Scientific.
Huang S, Zhou J, Gao L, Tang Y. 2020. Plant miR397 and its functions. Functional Plant Biology 48: 361-70. doi: 10.1071/FP20342.
Ikai A. 1980. Thermostability and aliphatic index of globular proteins. The Journal of Biochemistry 88: 1895-98
Iordachescu M, Verlinden S. 2005. Transcriptional regulation of three EIN3-like genes of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L. cv. Improved White Sim) during flower development and upon wounding, pollination, and ethylene exposure. Journal of Experimental Botany 56: 2011-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri199
Jorge JG, Villalobos-López MA, Chavarría-Alvarado KL, Ríos-Meléndez S, López-Meyer M, Arroyo-Becerra A. 2020. Genome-wide transcriptional changes triggered by water deficit on a drought-tolerant common bean cultivar. BMC plant biology 20: 1-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02664-1
Jourda C, Cardi C, Mbéguié‐A‐Mbéguié D, Bocs S, Garsmeur O, et al. 2014. Expansion of banana (Musa acuminata) gene families involved in ethylene biosynthesis and signalling after lineage‐specific whole‐genome duplications. New Phytologist 202: 986-1000. doi: 10.1111/nph.12710
Ju C, Chang C. 2015. Mechanistic insights in ethylene perception and signal transduction. Plant Physiology 169: 85-95. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00845
Jyoti SD, Azim JB, Robin AHK. 2021. Genome-wide characterization and expression profiling of EIN3/EIL family genes in Zea mays. Plant Gene 25: 100270
Lee JH, Kim WT. 2003. Molecular and biochemical characterization of VR-EILs encoding mung bean ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3-LIKE proteins. Plant Physiology 132: 1475-88. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.022574
Letunic I, Bork P. 2011. Interactive Tree of Life v2: online annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy. Nucleic acids research 39: W475-W78. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr201
Li J, Li Z, Tang L, Yang Y, Zouine M, Bouzayen M. 2012. A conserved phosphorylation site regulates the transcriptional function of Ethylene-Insensitive3-like1 in tomato. Journal of experimental botany 63: 427-39. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err289
Li Q, Shen Y, Guo L, Wang H, Zhang Y, et al. 2019. The EIL transcription factor family in soybean: Genome‐wide identification, expression profiling and genetic diversity analysis. FEBS open bio-9: 629-42. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12596
Liu C, Li J, Zhu P, Yu J, Hou J, et al. 2019. Mulberry EIL3 confers salt and drought tolerances and modulates ethylene biosynthetic gene expression. PeerJ 7: e6391. doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6391
Mangan S, Alon U. 2003. Structure and function of the feed-forward loop network motif. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 11980-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2133841100
Mao C, Wang S, Jia Q, Wu P. 2006. OsEIL1, a rice homolog of the Arabidopsis EIN3 regulates the ethylene response as a positive component. Plant molecular biology 61: 141. doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-6184-1
Maruyama-Nakashita A, Nakamura Y, Tohge T, Saito K, Takahashi H. 2006. Arabidopsis SLIM1 is a central transcriptional regulator of plant sulfur response and metabolism. The Plant Cell 18: 3235-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.106.046458
Miller JB, Pickett BD, Ridge PG. 2019. JustOrthologs: a fast, accurate and user-friendly ortholog identification algorithm. Bioinformatics 35: 546-52. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty669
Öktüren F, Sönmez S. 2005. Bitki Besin Maddeleri ile Bazı Bitki Büyüme Düzenleyicileri (Hormonlar) Arasindaki İlişkiler. Derim 22: 20-32
Pramoolkit P, Lertpanyasampatha M, Viboonjun U, Kongsawadworakul P, Chrestin H, Narangajavana J. 2014. Involvement of ethylene-responsive microRNAs and their targets in increased latex yield in the rubber tree in response to ethylene treatment. Plant physiology and biochemistry 84: 203-12. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.09.016
Rieu I, Mariani C, Weterings K. 2003. Expression analysis of five tobacco EIN3 family members in relation to tissue‐specific ethylene responses. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 2239-44. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg240
Salih H, He S, Li H, Peng Z, Du X. 2020. Investigation of the EIL/EIN3 transcription factor gene family members and their expression levels in the early stage of cotton Fiber development. Plants 9: 128. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ plants9010128
Shibuya K, Barry KG, Ciardi JA, Loucas HM, Underwood BA, et al. 2004. The central role of PhEIN2 in ethylene responses throughout plant development in petunia. Plant Physiology 136: 2900-12. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.046979.
Song J, Zhu C, Zhang X, Wen X, Liu L, et al. 2015. Biochemical and structural insights into the mechanism of DNA recognition by Arabidopsis ETHYLENE INSENSITIVE3. PLoS One 10: e0137439. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0137439
Song L, Liu D. 2015. Ethylene and plant responses to phosphate deficiency. Frontiers in plant science 6: 796. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00796
Song S, Huang H, Gao H, Wang J, Wu D, et al. 2014. Interaction between MYC2 and Ethylene Insensitive3 modulates antagonism between jasmonate and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 26: 263-79. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.120394
Song S, Xu Y, Huang D, Ashraf MA, Li J, et al. 2018. Identification and characterization of miRNA169 family members in banana (Musa acuminata L.) that respond to fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense infection in banana cultivars. PeerJ 6: e6209. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6209
Sun G. 2012. MicroRNAs and their diverse functions in plants. Plant molecular biology 80: 17-36. doi: 10.1007/s11103-011-9817-6
Suyama M, Torrents D, Bork P. 2006. PAL2NAL: robust conversion of protein sequence alignments into the corresponding codon alignments. Nucleic acids research 34: W609-W12. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl315
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. 2011. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular biology and evolution 28: 2731-39. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121
Tieman DM, Ciardi JA, Taylor MG, Klee HJ. 2001. Members of the tomato LeEIL (EIN3‐like) gene family are functionally redundant and regulate ethylene responses throughout plant development. The Plant Journal 26: 47-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01006.x
Voorrips R. 2002. MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. Journal of heredity 93: 77-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/93.1.77
Waki K, Shibuya K, Yoshioka T, Hashiba T, Satoh S. 2001. Cloning of a cDNA encoding EIN3‐like protein (DC‐EIL1) and decrease in its mRNA level during senescence in carnation flower tissues. Journal of Experimental Botany 52: 377-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/52.355.377
Wang J, Ye Y, Xu M, Feng L, Xu L-a. 2019. Roles of the SPL gene family and miR156 in the salt stress responses of tamarisk (Tamarix chinensis). BMC plant biology 19: 1-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1977-6
Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, et al. 2018. SWISS-MODEL: homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic acids research 46: W296-W303. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky427
Wawrzyńska A, Lewandowska M, Sirko A. 2010. Nicotiana tabacum EIL2 directly regulates expression of at least one tobacco gene induced by sulphur starvation. Journal of experimental botany 61: 889-900. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp356
Wawrzyńska A, Sirko A. 2014. To control and to be controlled: understanding the Arabidopsis SLIM1 function in sulfur deficiency through comprehensive investigation of the EIL protein family. Frontiers in plant science 5: 575. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00575
Wittkopp PJ, Kalay G. 2012. Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nature Reviews Genetics 13: 59-69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3095
Wu J, Wang L, Wang S. 2017. MicroRNAs associated with drought response in the pulse crop common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Gene 628: 78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2017.07.038
Yamasaki K, Kigawa T, Inoue M, Yamasaki T, Yabuki T, et al. 2005. Solution structure of the major DNA-binding domain of Arabidopsis thaliana ethylene-insensitive3-like3. Journal of molecular biology 348: 253-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.02.065
Yang C, Ma B, He SJ, Xiong Q, Duan KX, et al. 2015. Maohuzi6/Ethylene Insensitive3-Like1 and Ethylene Insensitive3-Like2 regulate ethylene response of roots and coleoptiles and negatively affect salt tolerance in rice. Plant Physiology 169: 148-65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00353
Yang SF, Hoffman NE. 1984. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annual review of plant physiology 35: 155-89. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. pp.35.060184.001103
Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2000. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Molecular biology and evolution 17: 32-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev. a026236
Yi‐Qin H, Wen‐di H, Lei Y, Yi‐Ting L, Chen L, et al. 2020. Genome‐wide analysis of ethylene‐insensitive3 (EIN3/EIL) in Triticum aestivum. Crop Science 60: 2019-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20115
Yıldız S, Okay A, Büyük İ. 2021. Defining the roles of PvMDH genes in response to salt stress and detailed characterization of the gene family. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology: 1-14. doi:10.1007/s13562-021-00690-0
Yin Xr, Allan AC, Chen Ks, Ferguson IB. 2010. Kiwifruit EIL and ERF genes involved in regulating fruit ripening. Plant Physiology 153: 1280-92. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.157081
Yin X-r, Allan AC, Zhang B, Wu R-m, Burdon J, et al. 2009. Ethylene-related genes show a differential response to low temperature during ‘Hayward’kiwifruit ripening. Postharvest Biology and Technology 52: 9-15
Zewdie T, Hassen E. 2021. Review on effects of phosphorus fertilizer rates on growth, yield components and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Current Research in Food Science 2: 34-39
Zhang Y. 2005. miRU: an automated plant miRNA target prediction server. Nucleic acids research 33: W701-W04. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki383
Zhang Z, Li J, Zhao XQ, Wang J, Wong GKS, Yu J. 2006. KaKs_Calculator: calculating Ka and Ks through model selection and model averaging. Genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics 4: 259-63. doi: 10.1016/S1672-0229(07) 60007-2.
Zhu Z, An F, Feng Y, Li P, Xue L, et al. 2011. Derepression of ethylene-stabilized transcription factors (EIN3/EIL1) mediates jasmonate and ethylene signaling synergy in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 12539-44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/ pnas.1103959108
İndir
Yayınlanmış
Nasıl Atıf Yapılır
Sayı
Bölüm
Lisans
Bu çalışma Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ile lisanslanmıştır.
